Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
THE ROLE OF THE UNITARY MODEL OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN PATRISTIC APOLOGETICS
by
Mutie, Jeremiah
in
Anthropology
/ Bible
/ Christianity
/ Christians
/ Gnosticism
/ God
/ Origen (185?-254?)
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
THE ROLE OF THE UNITARY MODEL OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN PATRISTIC APOLOGETICS
by
Mutie, Jeremiah
in
Anthropology
/ Bible
/ Christianity
/ Christians
/ Gnosticism
/ God
/ Origen (185?-254?)
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
THE ROLE OF THE UNITARY MODEL OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN PATRISTIC APOLOGETICS
Journal Article
THE ROLE OF THE UNITARY MODEL OF ANTHROPOLOGY IN PATRISTIC APOLOGETICS
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
(ProQuest: ... denotes non-USASCII text omitted.) Debates among Christians concerning the composition of man date back to early Christianity. \"7 Gousmett, who has done some of the most significant work in this area, argues that this model, though evident in Platonism and other aspects of Greek thought, was adopted by some Christians as a result of \"decline in millennialism, rise of ascetism, and glorification of virginity and denigration of marriage, as well as an eclipse of the centrality and significance of the resurrection of the body. \"9 Its adoption by Christians coincided with the interaction of Christianity with Greek thought and seems to have been a result of an emphasis on the concept of the immortality of the soul. Thankfully, Irenaeus provides the reader with enough information to answer these questions. Since Irenaeus was defending the doctrine of bodily resurrection, consensus in scholarship is that his opponents here were the gnostic groups that had borrowed Platonic ideas concerning the body.
Publisher
Evangelical Theological Society
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.