Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
COMPARISON OF SMEAR LAYER FORMATION IN APICAL THIRD OF ROOT CANALS USING TRUNATOMY AND F-ONE BLUE ROTARY FILE INSTRUMENTATION WITH SONIC AND SUBSONIC ACTIVATION METHODS: IN VITRO
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
COMPARISON OF SMEAR LAYER FORMATION IN APICAL THIRD OF ROOT CANALS USING TRUNATOMY AND F-ONE BLUE ROTARY FILE INSTRUMENTATION WITH SONIC AND SUBSONIC ACTIVATION METHODS: IN VITRO
Do you wish to request the book?
COMPARISON OF SMEAR LAYER FORMATION IN APICAL THIRD OF ROOT CANALS USING TRUNATOMY AND F-ONE BLUE ROTARY FILE INSTRUMENTATION WITH SONIC AND SUBSONIC ACTIVATION METHODS: IN VITRO
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
COMPARISON OF SMEAR LAYER FORMATION IN APICAL THIRD OF ROOT CANALS USING TRUNATOMY AND F-ONE BLUE ROTARY FILE INSTRUMENTATION WITH SONIC AND SUBSONIC ACTIVATION METHODS: IN VITRO
2023
Overview
The success of endodontic treatment is dependent on triad endodontic. The endodontic instrument has tendency to leave amount of smear layer after its use. Therefore, irrigation becomes fundamental to ensure the cleaning. The goal of this research is to observe the differences among files toward smear layer production and the most effective activation method. Twenty-four single canal mandible premolars were decoronated in the cementoenamel junction and root canal treatment followed. The teeth were divided into four groups: Group A (sample was prepared using F-One Blue and activated using sonic frequency (EDDY)), Group B (sample was prepared using F-One Blue and activated using subsonic frequency (EndoActivator)), Group C (sample was prepared using TruNatomy and activated using sonic frequency (EDDY)) and Group D (sample was prepared using TruNatomy and activated using subsonic frequency (EndoActivator)). All teeth were cut longitudinally then examined using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). SEM results were scored using double blind method. One-way ANOVA test showed there were differences in the removal of smear layer. Post Hoc LSD test showed there was significance difference between group B and group D; also between group D and group A. The other groups showed no difference statistically. It was concluded that all preparation and activation methods will leave the smear layer in root canal system whatsoever. Preparation of root canal using F-One Blue file, irrigated using 2,5% NaOCl and activated using sonic frequency (EDDY) showed the best smear layer removal. Study on activation method showed no significance differences between EDDY nor Endoactivator.
Publisher
Azerbaijan Medical Journal
Subject
