Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Users Favor LLM-Generated Content -- Until They Know It's AI
by
Naidenova, Iuliia
, Nesseler, Cornel
, Parshakov, Petr
, Matkin, Nikita
, Paklina, Sofia
in
Quality assessment
/ Questions
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Users Favor LLM-Generated Content -- Until They Know It's AI
by
Naidenova, Iuliia
, Nesseler, Cornel
, Parshakov, Petr
, Matkin, Nikita
, Paklina, Sofia
in
Quality assessment
/ Questions
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Users Favor LLM-Generated Content -- Until They Know It's AI
Paper
Users Favor LLM-Generated Content -- Until They Know It's AI
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In this paper, we investigate how individuals evaluate human and large langue models generated responses to popular questions when the source of the content is either concealed or disclosed. Through a controlled field experiment, participants were presented with a set of questions, each accompanied by a response generated by either a human or an AI. In a randomized design, half of the participants were informed of the response's origin while the other half remained unaware. Our findings indicate that, overall, participants tend to prefer AI-generated responses. However, when the AI origin is revealed, this preference diminishes significantly, suggesting that evaluative judgments are influenced by the disclosure of the response's provenance rather than solely by its quality. These results underscore a bias against AI-generated content, highlighting the societal challenge of improving the perception of AI work in contexts where quality assessments should be paramount.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.