Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
War and Peace
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
War and Peace
Do you wish to request the book?
War and Peace
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
War and Peace
2002
Overview
A review essay on a book by John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001). Mearsheimer errs in claiming that all national security decisions are rational ones. In contrast, sometimes state ambitions & actions go beyond what \"rationality\" typically would permit; sometimes states do not assert capabilities that they clearly possess. The explanations for such outcomes reside in realms that Mearsheimer either does not consider or dismisses too readily, such as alignments, democracy, ideology, & economic relationships. He also charts a role for the US (a state confronting \"the stopping power of water\" that is too limited given the objectives (a balance of power) that he believes it should seek to create. His theory of war is too restricted & so therefore is his theory of peace. But he has fashioned one of the first new empirical essays in general realist theory in recent years & deserves to be commended. His approach will be the focus of debate & analysis for some time to come. 1 Figure. Adapted from the source document.
Subject
