Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation and clinical applicability of angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance: a 15 OH 2 O PET study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation and clinical applicability of angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance: a 15 OH 2 O PET study
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation and clinical applicability of angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance: a 15 OH 2 O PET study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluation and clinical applicability of angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance: a 15 OH 2 O PET study
2025
Overview
The introduction of wire-free microcirculatory resistance index from functional angiography (angio-IMR) promises swift detection of coronary microvascular dysfunction, however it has not been properly validated. We sought to validate angio-IMR against invasive IMR and PET derived microvascular resistance (MVR). Moreover, we studied if angio-IMR could aid in the detection of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). In this investigator-initiated study symptomatic patients underwent [
O]H
O positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive angiography with 3-vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR). Invasive IMR was measured in 40 patients. Angio-IMR and QFR were computed retrospectively. MVR was defined as the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to PET derived coronary flow. PET and QFR/angio-IMR analyses were performed by blinded core labs. The right coronary artery was excluded. A total of 211 patients (mean age 61 ± 9, 148 (70%) male) with 312 vessels with successful angio-IMR analyses were included. Angio-IMR correlated moderately with invasive IMR (r = 0.48, p < 0.01), whereas no correlation was found between angio-IMR and MVR (r=-0.07, p = 0.25). Angio-IMR did not differ for vessels without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (FFR-) but with reduced stress perfusion (PET+) compared to vessels without obstructive CAD (FFR-) with normal stress perfusion (PET-) (median 28.19 IQR 20.42-38.99 vs. 31.67 IQR 23.47-40.63, p = 0.40). Angio-IMR correlated moderately with invasively measured IMR, whereas angio-IMR did not correlate with PET derived MVR. Moreover, angio-IMR did not reliably identify patients with INOCA.
Subject
/ Coronary Angiography - methods
/ Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging
/ Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
/ Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging
/ Coronary Vessels - physiopathology
/ Female
/ Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods
/ Oxygen Radioisotopes - administration & dosage
/ Positron-Emission Tomography
