Explore the vast range of titles available.

Anaemia is defined by WHO as Hb < 13.0 g/dL in male adults and <12.0 g/dL in female adults. It is a common comorbidity in patients of heart failure with both HFrEF and HFpEF. The incidence ranges between 30% and 50%, though in certain communities, it is likely to be higher still. Elderly age, severe heart failure, poor nutrition, and elevation of inflammatory markers are associated with a higher incidence of anaemia. However, the commonest contributing factor to anaemia in HF is iron deficiency. In a Canadian study of 12 065 patients, the incidence of absolute ID was 21% in anaemic patients. Many other western studies have also quoted incidences varying between 35% and 43%. The earlier attempts to improve outcomes by supplementation with Erythropoietic‐stimulating factors were unsuccessful and resulted in a higher incidence of thrombotic events. Iron deficiency (ID) has emerged as an important factor in patients of HF, even in those without anaemia and worsens outcomes. It is defined as Ferritin levels below 100 mcg/L or 100–299 μg/L with transferrin saturation of <20%. Attempts to correct ID by oral supplementation have been unsuccessful as seen in IRON‐HF and IRONOUT‐HF trials. FAIR‐HF and CONFIRM‐HF conclusively established the role of IV Iron in improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with HFrEF. ESC guidelines have given a class IC indication for testing all heart failure patients for ID, and an IIaA recommendation for its correction by IV ferric carboxymaltose was found to be deficient. Ongoing trials will establish the role of IV iron in improving mortality and in HFpEF patients and in patients with acute heart failure.

This Series paper highlights the substantial progress made in understanding and preventing heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Improving global standards of care for management of acute myocardial infarction with timelier reperfusion has led to stepwise reductions in risk of incident heart failure. Landmark clinical trials have established the role of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, β blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to specifically reduce the risk of incident heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. However, residual risk of heart failure persists in many individuals, even after revascularisation and standard medical therapies. We review recent epidemiological trends from the past four decades, evolving understanding of the pathological mechanisms underlying incident heart failure, and modern risk stratification tools. We then propose a treatment pathway tailored to individual patient risk and discuss potential future strategies to incrementally improve the risk of development of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.

Background Frailty is a severe, common co‐morbidity associated with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The impact of frailty on HFpEF outcomes may affect treatment choices in HFpEF. The impact of frailty on HFpEF patients and any impact on the clinical benefits of sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition in HFpEF have been described in only a limited number of trials. Whether the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin would improve or worsen frailty status when given to HFpEF patients is also not known. The aims of this study were, therefore, to evaluate, in HFpEF patients enrolled in the EMPEROR‐Preserved trial (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes, and on the effects of empagliflozin, as well as the effect of empagliflozin on frailty status during treatment period. Methods We calculated a cumulative deficit‐derived frailty index (FI) using 44 variables including clinical, laboratory and quality of life parameters recorded in EMPEROR‐Preserved. Patients were classified into four groups: non‐frail (FI < 0.21), mild frailty (0.21 to <0.30), moderate frailty (0.30 to <0.40) and severe frailty (≥0.40). Clinical outcomes and health‐related quality of life were evaluated according to baseline FI along with the effect of empagliflozin on chronological changes in FI (at 12, 32 and 52 weeks). Results The patient distribution was 1514 (25.3%), 2100 (35.1%), 1501 (25.1%) and 873 (14.6%) in non‐frail, mild frailty, moderate frailty and severe frailty, respectively. Severe frailty patients tended to be female and have low Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, more co‐morbidities and more polypharmacy. Incidence rates of the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization increased as frailty worsened (hazard ratio [HR] of each FI category compared with the non‐frail group: 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.89–1.35], 2.00 [1.63–2.47] and 2.61 [2.08–3.27] in the mild frailty, moderate frailty and severe frailty groups, respectively; P trend < 0.001). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the risk for the primary outcome across the four FI categories, HR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.42–0.83], 0.79 [0.61–1.01], 0.77 [0.61–0.96] and 0.90 [0.69–1.16] in non‐frail to severe frailty categories, respectively (P value for trend = 0.097). Empagliflozin also improved other clinical outcomes and KCCQ score across frailty categories. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin‐treated patients had a higher likelihood of being in a lower FI category at Weeks 12, 32 and 52 (P < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.12 [95% CI 1.01–1.24] at Week 12, 1.21 [1.09–1.34] at Week 32 and 1.20 [1.09–1.33] at Week 52. Conclusions Empagliflozin improved key efficacy outcomes with a possible diminution of effect in very frail patients. Empagliflozin also improved frailty status during follow‐up.

In the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) heart failure (HF) guidelines, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and for the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Further trials showed efficacy of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). These results prompted a broadened recommendation for the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin across the whole left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum in the 2023 Focused Update of the ESC HF guidelines and in other international guidelines. In SOLOIST‐WHF and EMPULSE, sotagliflozin (enrolling only patients with T2DM) and empagliflozin, respectively, were beneficial when initiated at the end or soon after an episode of decompensated HF. Based on these results and on the early appearance of their beneficial effects, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors should start early in patients hospitalized for acute HF. Analyses after study drug withdrawal in randomized clinical trials have shown that their benefits may decline rapidly after discontinuation, and thus, persistence of treatment is advised. In EMPACT‐MI, empagliflozin did not reduce the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death/HF hospitalization but reduced first/recurrent HF hospitalizations. Potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in further specific conditions (i.e., cardiac amyloidosis, grown‐up congenital heart disease and paediatric patients with HF) have been reported in observational studies but need confirmation from prospective trials. This scientific statement summarizes current evidence regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of HF.

Background & objectives: Heart failure (HF) is emerging as a major health problem in India. The profile of HF in India is divergent from elsewhere in the world. While cardiologists must equip themselves with the requisite clinical management tools, scientists and health policymakers would need epidemiological data on HF and information on the resources required to meet the challenges ahead. The aim of this study was to identify the lacunae and to suggest recommendations to improve HF research. Methods: We surveyed a multidisciplinary group of HF experts using a two stage process. An email-based survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire, followed by an online discussion. The experts prioritized the major challenges in convergence research in India and inter-rater agreement values were calculated. In addition, they enlisted potential research gaps and barriers in the domains of epidemiology, diagnostics, management and technology and suggested recommendations to overcome those barriers. Results: The experts identified a paucity of data on HF burden, lack of state-of-the-art diagnostic facilities and trained personnel, overt dependence on imported devices/equipment/reagents, lack of interaction/awareness/information among stakeholders and lack of biobanks, as major barriers in HF research. Three fourths of the experts agreed that lack of interaction among stakeholders was the major challenge with the highest inter-rater agreement in both stages (19 out of 25 and 11 out of 17, respectively). The experts recommended the creation of multidisciplinary taskforces dedicated to population sciences, data sciences, technology development and patient management with short-, intermediate- and long-term strategies. Interpretation & conclusions: The study generated a wish list for advances in HF research and management, and proposed recommendations for facilitating convergence research as a way forward to reduce the burden of HF in India.

Epidemiological data from the Indian subcontinent on the burden of Heart failure (HF) is scarce. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are usually used in the management of HF and hypertension. A consortium of experts reviewed and opined on the pathophysiological role of aldosterone in HF and its cascading effects on the heart in terms of cardiac fibrosis, cardiac hypertrophy, and remodeling, increased propensity to cause arrhythmias in addition to its effect on sodium and water retention. This expert opinion document highlights the various mechanisms of action of MRAs. It provides clinical experience and practice-based expert opinion on the use of spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with HF. The role of MRAs in diabetic patients with HF has also been profiled.

Among patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes, semaglutide produced greater reductions in symptoms, physical limitations, and body weight than placebo at 1 year.

In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity, semaglutide (2.4 mg) led to greater reductions in symptoms and physical limitations and greater improvements in exercise function than placebo.

Aims We aimed to characterize ethnic differences in prevalence, clinical correlates, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF) across Asia. Methods and results Among 5504 patients with HF prospectively recruited across 11 Asian regions using identical protocols in the Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure study (mean age 61 ± 13 years, 27% women, 83% HFrEF), 1383 (25%) had AF defined as a history of AF and/or AF/flutter on baseline electrocardiogram. Clinical correlates of AF were similar across ethnicities and included older age, prior stroke, higher NT‐proBNP, and larger left atria. Diabetes was associated with lower odds of AF in HFrEF [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95] and HFpEF (AOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.84) regardless of ethnicity. Compared with Chinese ethnicity, Japanese/Koreans had higher odds of AF in HFrEF (AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.40–2.21), while Indians had lower odds in HFrEF (AOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13–0.24) and HFpEF (AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16–0.49) even after adjusting for clinical covariates. Interaction between ethnicity and region was observed among Indians, with Southeast Asian Indians having higher odds of AF (AOR 3.01, 95% CI 1.60–5.67) compared with South Asian Indians. AF was associated with poorer quality of life and increased risk of 1 year all‐cause mortality or HF hospitalisation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.18–1.63) regardless of ethnicity. Conclusions Among patients with HF across Asia, clinical correlates and adverse outcomes associated with AF are similar across ethnicities; however, there are striking ethnic variations in the prevalence of AF that are not accounted for by known risk factors.

Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, those who received the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin had a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure than those who received placebo.