Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with known cardiovascular disease who have not had a recent acute event are often referred to as having stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The concept of ‘stable’ CAD is misleading for two important reasons: the continuing risks of cardiovascular events over the longer term and the diverse spectrum of powerful risk characteristics. The risks of cardiovascular events are frequently underestimated and continue to exist, despite current standards of care for secondary prevention, including lifestyle changes, optimal medical therapy, myocardial revascularization and the use of antiplatelet agents to limit thrombosis. In dispelling the myth of ‘stable’ CAD, we explore the pathophysiology of the disease and the relative contribution of plaque and systemic factors to cardiovascular events. A broader concept of the vulnerable patient, not just the vulnerable plaque, takes into account the diversity and future risks of atherothrombotic events. We also evaluate new and ongoing research into medical therapies aimed at further reducing the risks of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic — but not stable — atherothrombotic disease.

Advances in antiplatelet therapies for patients with cardiovascular disease have improved patient outcomes over time, but the challenge of balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding remains substantial. Moreover, many patients with cardiovascular disease have a residual risk of ischaemic events despite receiving antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, novel strategies are needed to prevent clinical events through mechanisms beyond platelet inhibition and with an acceptable associated risk of bleeding. The advent of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, which attenuate fibrin formation by selective inhibition of factor Xa or thrombin, has renewed the interest in dual-pathway inhibition strategies that combine an antiplatelet agent with an anticoagulant drug. In this Review, we highlight the emerging pharmacological rationale and clinical development of dual-pathway inhibition strategies for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with different manifestations of cardiovascular disease, such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery disease.Many patients with cardiovascular disease have a residual risk of ischaemic events despite receiving antiplatelet therapy. In this Review, Angiolillo and colleagues discuss the pharmacological rationale and clinical development of dual-pathway inhibition strategies for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with cardiovascular disease.

In this trial, 14,264 patients with atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. In a per-protocol, as-treated analysis, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increase in the risk of ischemic stroke by a factor of four to five 1 and accounts for up to 15% of strokes in persons of all ages and 30% in persons over the age of 80 years. 2 The use of vitamin K antagonists is highly effective for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and is recommended for persons at increased risk. 3 – 5 However, food and drug interactions necessitate frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments, requirements that make it difficult for many patients to use such drugs in clinical practice. 6 – 8 Rivaroxaban is . . .

In patients with acute coronary syndromes, low doses of rivaroxaban were effective in reducing the primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Rivaroxaban also reduced overall mortality, although there was more bleeding. After an acute coronary syndrome, patients remain at risk for recurrent cardiovascular events despite standard medical therapy, including long-term antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an adenosine diphosphate–receptor inhibitor. This risk may be related in part to excess thrombin generation that persists beyond the acute presentation in such patients. 1 As a result, there has been interest in evaluating the role of oral anticoagulants after an acute coronary syndrome. Improved cardiovascular outcomes were reported for patients who were treated with the anticoagulant warfarin in addition to aspirin. 2 However, widespread use of long-term warfarin in such patients has been limited by challenges associated . . .

Clopidogrel must be metabolized to an active form to be effective. Cytochrome P-450 variants resulting in slow metabolism may reduce clinical efficacy. This study in patients with acute coronary syndromes or atrial fibrillation did not confirm diminished efficacy in those with slow metabolism. Clopidogrel, when added to aspirin, reduces the rate of major vascular events among patients with acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation. 1 , 2 Recent reports suggest that certain common genetic variants, involving the hepatic cytochrome P-450 system, that are involved in the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite are associated with an increased rate of recurrent cardiovascular events, implying that the benefits of clopidogrel may be attenuated in patients with these genetic variants. Specifically, in patients who are carriers of a loss-of-function CYP2C19 allele (including the *2 and *3 alleles), the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite may be . . .

This trial compared standard therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy plus a vitamin K antagonist) with two regimens containing rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy. The rivaroxaban groups had reduced rates of bleeding and similar efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events. Approximately 5 to 8% of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have atrial fibrillation. 1 – 3 Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a P2Y 12 inhibitor and aspirin is superior to oral anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist in reducing the risk of thrombosis in patients undergoing placement of a first-generation stent, 4 but oral anticoagulation is superior to DAPT in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. 5 The treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who have received stents must balance the risk of stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke with the risk of bleeding. A common guideline-supported . . .

There is limited knowledge of the scale and impact of multimorbidity for patients who have had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the extent to which multimorbidity is associated with long-term survival following AMI. This national observational study included 693,388 patients (median age 70.7 years, 452,896 [65.5%] male) from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (England and Wales) who were admitted with AMI between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2013. There were 412,809 (59.5%) patients with multimorbidity at the time of admission with AMI, i.e., having at least 1 of the following long-term health conditions: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, heart failure, renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, or hypertension. Those with heart failure, renal failure, or cerebrovascular disease had the worst outcomes (39.5 [95% CI 39.0-40.0], 38.2 [27.7-26.8], and 26.6 [25.2-26.4] deaths per 100 person-years, respectively). Latent class analysis revealed 3 multimorbidity phenotype clusters: (1) a high multimorbidity class, with concomitant heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension, (2) a medium multimorbidity class, with peripheral vascular disease and hypertension, and (3) a low multimorbidity class. Patients in class 1 were less likely to receive pharmacological therapies compared with class 2 and 3 patients (including aspirin, 83.8% versus 87.3% and 87.2%, respectively; β-blockers, 74.0% versus 80.9% and 81.4%; and statins, 80.6% versus 85.9% and 85.2%). Flexible parametric survival modelling indicated that patients in class 1 and class 2 had a 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.3-2.5) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.4-1.5) increased risk of death and a loss in life expectancy of 2.89 and 1.52 years, respectively, compared with those in class 3 over the 8.4-year follow-up period. The study was limited to all-cause mortality due to the lack of available cause-specific mortality data. However, we isolated the disease-specific association with mortality by providing the loss in life expectancy following AMI according to multimorbidity phenotype cluster compared with the general age-, sex-, and year-matched population. Multimorbidity among patients with AMI was common, and conferred an accumulative increased risk of death. Three multimorbidity phenotype clusters that were significantly associated with loss in life expectancy were identified and should be a concomitant treatment target to improve cardiovascular outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03037255.

The use of non-invasive imaging to identify ruptured or high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques would represent a major clinical advance for prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease. We used combined PET and CT to identify ruptured and high-risk atherosclerotic plaques using the radioactive tracers 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). In this prospective clinical trial, patients with myocardial infarction (n=40) and stable angina (n=40) underwent 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET-CT, and invasive coronary angiography. 18F-NaF uptake was compared with histology in carotid endarterectomy specimens from patients with symptomatic carotid disease, and with intravascular ultrasound in patients with stable angina. The primary endpoint was the comparison of 18F-fluoride tissue-to-background ratios of culprit and non-culprit coronary plaques of patients with acute myocardial infarction. In 37 (93%) patients with myocardial infarction, the highest coronary 18F-NaF uptake was seen in the culprit plaque (median maximum tissue-to-background ratio: culprit 1·66 [IQR 1·40–2·25] vs highest non-culprit 1·24 [1·06–1·38], p<0·0001). By contrast, coronary 18F-FDG uptake was commonly obscured by myocardial uptake and where discernible, there were no differences between culprit and non-culprit plaques (1·71 [1·40–2·13] vs 1·58 [1·28–2·01], p=0·34). Marked 18F-NaF uptake occurred at the site of all carotid plaque ruptures and was associated with histological evidence of active calcification, macrophage infiltration, apoptosis, and necrosis. 18 (45%) patients with stable angina had plaques with focal 18F-NaF uptake (maximum tissue-to-background ratio 1·90 [IQR 1·61–2·17]) that were associated with more high-risk features on intravascular ultrasound than those without uptake: positive remodelling (remodelling index 1·12 [1·09–1·19] vs 1·01 [0·94–1·06]; p=0·0004), microcalcification (73% vs 21%, p=0·002), and necrotic core (25% [21–29] vs 18% [14–22], p=0·001). 18F-NaF PET-CT is the first non-invasive imaging method to identify and localise ruptured and high-risk coronary plaque. Future studies are needed to establish whether this method can improve the management and treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Chief Scientist Office Scotland and British Heart Foundation.

Individuals with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis are at elevated risk for thromboembolic events. Factor (F) XI, which is in the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, is emerging as an attractive target for new anticoagulants that may be safer than existing agents. Osocimab—an inhibitory FXIa antibody—is a potential treatment option for such patients. We conducted a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in which 704 participants (448 male, 256 female) with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis were randomized to receive lower- or higher-dose osocimab or placebo. In total, 686 participants (436 male, 250 female) received treatment for ≤18 months (planned minimal treatment period of 6 months). The co-primary outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and a composite of the incidence of moderate, severe or serious adverse events. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 16/232 (6.9%) and 11/224 (4.9%) participants who received lower- and higher-dose osocimab, respectively, and in 18/230 participants (7.8%) who received a placebo. For the composite adverse event endpoint, incidences were 51%, 47% and 43% in the lower-dose osocimab, higher-dose osocimab and placebo groups, respectively. These results suggest that osocimab is associated with a low risk of bleeding and is generally well tolerated in this population; findings that require confirmation in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04523220 . In a phase 2 trial involving patients with kidney failure who were undergoing hemodialysis, treatment with osocimab—an antibody targeting coagulation factor XIa—did not lead to increased rates of clinically relevant bleeding or an increased risk of adverse events as compared to placebo, suggesting the possibility that factor XIa inhibitors may be safer in this patient population than currently available anticoagulants.

After an INR-monitoring device used in the ROCKET AF trial was recalled by the FDA because of possible inaccuracies in INR readings under certain conditions, a post hoc reanalysis of the trial data showed no significant effect of this issue on the trial outcomes. To the Editor: In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), investigators found that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. 1 In December 2014, four years after completion of the trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall notice for a medical device correction of the Alere INRatio Monitor System (formally known as the Hemosense INRatio device). The recall correction notice was issued because the FDA-approved and European . . .