Explore the vast range of titles available.

In phase 1 trials, the HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor cabotegravir (GSK1265744) was well tolerated, both alone, and in combination with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor rilpivirine. We assessed cabotegravir plus rilpivirine, as a two-drug oral antiretroviral regimen, for the maintenance of viral suppression in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. In the phase 2b Long-Acting antireTroviral Treatment Enabling (LATTE) trial, a multicentre study done in Canada and the USA, antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected adults (aged ≥18 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to oral cabotegravir 10 mg once a day, 30 mg once a day, 60 mg once a day, or oral efavirenz 600 mg once a day with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 24 weeks of induction. Patients who were virologically suppressed by week 24 received a two-drug maintenance regimen consisting of their randomly allocated cabotegravir dose plus oral rilpivirine 25 mg or continued efavirenz plus NRTIs for an additional 72 weeks. Patients and investigators were masked to doses of cabotegravir received for 96 weeks, but not to the assignment of cabotegravir or efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with fewer than 50 copies per mL of HIV-1 RNA (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at week 48. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01641809. Of 243 patients randomly allocated and treated, 156 (86%) of 181 patients in the cabotegravir groups (52 [87%] of 60, 51 [85%] of 60, and 53 [87%] of 61 patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) and 46 (74%) of 62 in the efavirenz group had fewer than 50 copies per mL of HIV-1 RNA after induction therapy. After patients in the cabotegravir groups were changed over from dual NRTIs to rilpivirine at week 24, 149 (82%; 95% CI 77–88) patients in the cabotegravir groups (48 [80%; 70–90], 48 [80%; 70–90], and 53 [87%; 78–95] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) versus 44 (71%; 60–82) in the efavirenz group were virologically suppressed at week 48, and 137 (76%; 69–82) receiving cabotegravir (41 [68%; 57–80], 45 [75%; 64–86], and 51 [84%; 74–93] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) versus 39 (63%; 51–75) in the efavirenz group were virologically suppressed at week 96. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 93 (51%) cabotegravir-treated patients (28 [47%], 32 [53%], and 33 [54%] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) and 42 (68%) efavirenz-treated patients. Six (3%) patients in the cabotegravir groups (one [2%], one [2%], and four [7%] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) withdrew because of treatment-emergent adverse events compared with nine (15%) in the efavirenz group. Cabotegravir plus dual NRTI therapy had potent antiviral activity during the induction phase. As a two-drug maintenance therapy, cabotegravir plus rilpivirine provided antiviral activity similar to efavirenz plus dual NRTIs until the end of week 96. Combined efficacy and safety results lend support to our selection of oral cabotegravir 30 mg once a day for further assessment. LATTE precedes studies of the assessment of longacting injectable formulations of both drugs as a two-drug regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Research and Development.

Phase 3 clinical studies showed non-inferiority of long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine dosed every 4 weeks to oral antiretroviral therapy. Important phase 2 results of every 8 weeks dosing, and supportive modelling, underpin further evaluation of every 8 weeks dosing in this trial, which has the potential to offer greater convenience. Our objective was to compare the week 48 antiviral efficacy of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting dosed every 8 weeks with that of every 4 weeks dosing. ATLAS-2M is an ongoing, randomised, multicentre (13 countries; Australia, Argentina, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA), open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority study of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting maintenance therapy administered intramuscularly every 8 weeks (cabotegravir 600 mg plus rilpivirine 900 mg) or every 4 weeks (cabotegravir 400 mg plus rilpivirine 600 mg) to treatment-experienced adults living with HIV-1. Eligible newly recruited individuals must have received an uninterrupted first or second oral standard-of-care regimen for at least 6 months without virological failure and be aged 18 years or older. Eligible participants from the ATLAS trial, from both the oral standard-of-care and long-acting groups, must have completed the 52-week comparative phase with an ATLAS-2M screening plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting every 8 weeks or every 4 weeks. The randomisation schedule was generated by means of the GlaxoSmithKline validated randomisation software RANDALL NG. The primary endpoint at week 48 was HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL (Snapshot, intention-to-treat exposed), with a non-inferiority margin of 4%. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03299049 and is ongoing. Screening occurred between Oct 27, 2017, and May 31, 2018. Of 1149 individuals screened, 1045 participants were randomised to the every 8 weeks (n=522) or every 4 weeks (n=523) groups; 37% (n=391) transitioned from every 4 weeks cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting in ATLAS. Median participant age was 42 years (IQR 34–50); 27% (n=280) female at birth; 73% (n=763) white race. Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting every 8 weeks was non-inferior to dosing every 4 weeks (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL; 2% vs 1%) with an adjusted treatment difference of 0·8 (95% CI −0·6–2·2). There were eight (2%, every 8 weeks group) and two (<1%, every 4 weeks group) confirmed virological failures (two sequential measures ≥200 copies per mL). For the every 8 weeks group, five (63%) of eight had archived non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations to rilpivirine at baseline. The safety profile was similar between dosing groups, with 844 (81%) of 1045 participants having adverse events (excluding injection site reactions); no treatment-related deaths occurred. The efficacy and safety profiles of dosing every 8 weeks and dosing every 4 weeks were similar. These results support the use of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting administered every 2 months as a therapeutic option for people living with HIV-1. ViiV Healthcare and Janssen.

Background Advances in HIV-1 therapeutics have led to the development of a range of daily oral treatment regimens, which share similar high efficacy rates. Consequently, more emphasis is being placed upon the individual’s experience of treatment and impact on quality of life. The first long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 (long-acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine [CAB + RPV LA]) may address challenges associated with oral treatment for HIV-1, such as stigma, pill burden/fatigue, drug–food interactions, and adherence. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected in an HIV-1 clinical trial (ATLAS-2M; NCT03299049) comparing participants’ experience with two dosing regimens (every 4 weeks [Q4W] vs. every 8 weeks [Q8W]) of CAB + RPV LA are presented herein. Methods PRO endpoints evaluated through 48 weeks of therapy included treatment satisfaction (HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [HIVTSQ]), treatment acceptance (“General Acceptance” domain of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance [ACCEPT ® ] questionnaire), acceptability of injections (Perception of Injection [PIN] questionnaire), treatment preference (questionnaire), and reasons for switching to/continuing long-acting therapy (exploratory endpoint; questionnaire). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive CAB + RPV LA Q8W or Q4W. Results were stratified by prior CAB + RPV exposure in either preplanned or post hoc analyses. Results Overall, 1045 participants were randomized to the Q8W ( n  = 522) and Q4W ( n  = 523) regimens; 37% ( n  = 391/1045) had previously received CAB + RPV in ATLAS. For participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure, large increases from baseline were reported in treatment satisfaction in both long-acting arms (HIVTSQ status version), with Q8W dosing statistically significantly favored at Weeks 24 ( p  = 0.036) and 48 ( p  = 0.004). Additionally, improvements from baseline were also observed in the “General Acceptance” domain of the ACCEPT questionnaire in both long-acting arms for participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between arms at either timepoint (Week 24, p  = 0.379; Week 48, p  = 0.525). Significant improvements ( p  < 0.001) in the “Acceptance of Injection Site Reactions” domain of the PIN questionnaire were observed from Week 8 to Weeks 24 and 48 in both arms for participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure. Participants with prior CAB + RPV exposure reported high treatment satisfaction (mean [HIVTSQ status version]: Q8W 62.2/66.0; Q4W 62.0/66.0), treatment acceptance (mean: Q8W 89.3/100; Q4W 91.2/100), and acceptance of injection site reactions (mean [5 = not at all acceptable; 1 = totally acceptable]: Q8W 1.72; Q4W 1.59) at baseline/Week 8 that were maintained over time. Participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure who received Q8W dosing preferred this regimen over oral CAB + RPV (98%, n  = 300/306). Among those with prior Q4W exposure, 94% ( n  = 179/191) preferred Q8W dosing versus Q4W dosing (3%, n  = 6/191) or oral CAB + RPV (2%, n  = 4/191). Conclusions Both long-acting regimens provided high treatment satisfaction and acceptance, irrespective of prior CAB + RPV exposure, with most participants preferring Q8W dosing over both the Q4W regimen and their previous daily oral regimen. The PRO data collected at Week 48 support the therapeutic potential of CAB + RPV LA. Funding ViiV Healthcare and Janssen. Trial Registration ATLAS-2M: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03299049, registered October 2, 2017. Plain Language Summary Developments in HIV-1 treatment have resulted in effective daily oral medications. However, life-long pill taking can come with several challenges. These include having a daily reminder of living with HIV-1. Treatment satisfaction is important to consider when evaluating a new medicine. This is because it can affect people’s quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate people’s experiences with the first long-acting injectable medicine for HIV-1. The medicine is called cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB + RPV LA). Over approximately 1 year, this study measured people’s satisfaction and experiences while receiving injections of CAB + RPV LA. Injections were given either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks. The study included people who had never had CAB + RPV LA, as well as people who were already receiving CAB + RPV LA. For people new to CAB + RPV LA, their satisfaction increased compared with their previous medication. They also had improvements in their experiences of injection site reactions throughout the study. For people who were already receiving CAB + RPV LA, their high satisfaction with this treatment and tolerability of injection site reactions were maintained over time. Overall, improvements were similar between people receiving injections every 4 weeks and people receiving injections every 8 weeks. People with experience of both injection schedules tended to prefer to receive injections every 8 weeks. These results show that CAB + RPV LA can provide quality-of-life improvements for people who have HIV-1.

Simplified treatment regimens for HIV management may increase adherence. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, longer-acting (monthly) injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine was compared with standard oral treatment. At 48 weeks, similar viral suppression was seen with the two regimens.

Background Cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) are under development as a novel long-acting (LA) regimen for maintenance of HIV virologic suppression. Pooled Week 48 data from pivotal Phase 3 trials demonstrated noninferiority of CAB LA + RPV LA vs. current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) on the primary endpoint, proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 c/mL (1.9% and 1.7%, respectively). Adherence to dosing visits, use of oral dosing (bridging) to cover planned missed injections and injection tolerability were examined for subjects in the ATLAS and FLAIR studies. Methods Virologically suppressed subjects (HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL) were randomized to switch to CAB LA + RPV LA or to continue CAR. On-time injections occurred Q4 weeks within a +7-day dosing window of the projected dosing date. Adherence to LA therapy was calculated as the number of on-time injection visits divided by the number of expected dosing visits through Week 48. Injection visits outside the pre-specified window and missed injection visits with/without the use of oral dosing were quantified. Injection tolerability was assessed via adverse event reporting. Results A total of 14,682 injections of CAB and RPV were administered to 581 subjects during 6,920 injection visits. 98% of injection visits took place within the allowed ±7-day dosing window with 3,194 (46%) on the projected dosing date. Forty-six (<1%) injection visits were early and 106 (2%) were late. Oral bridging was used in 16 subjects overall; 8 planned missed injection visits were successfully covered, with no change to virologic suppression status. No subject with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 c/mL at Week 48 had missed/late injection visits. 25% (3,663/14,682) of injections were associated with local injection site reactions (ISRs). The most common ISR was pain (3,087/3,663 = 84%). Most ISRs were grade 1–2 (99%), short duration (median 3 days), with few associated discontinuations (<1%). Conclusion Subjects receiving CAB LA + RPV LA demonstrated high rates of adherence to injection visits through week 48, with 98% of injections occurring within the ±7-day dosing window. Oral bridging with CAB and RPV was an effective strategy for maintaining viral load suppression to cover missed injection visits. Injections were well-tolerated with few associated discontinuations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Background Monthly injectable CAB LA + RPV LA was noninferior to daily oral 3-drug antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 virologically suppressed adults. CAB and RPV pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed during the 48 Week maintenance period of the ATLAS and FLAIR Phase 3 studies. Methods Patients received oral CAB 30 mg + RPV 25 mg once daily for 4 weeks to assess individual tolerability prior to intramuscular (IM) injections of CAB LA 600 mg + RPV LA 900 mg followed by CAB LA 400 mg + RPV LA 600 mg every 4 weeks. Plasma CAB and RPV concentrations were measured pre-and post-dose at select visits using validated analytical methods. Results Baseline demographics for the pooled randomized ATLAS and FLAIR population (n = 591, LA arms) were: median age 38 years, 27% female, 18% African American, median BMI 25 kg/m2 (range: 15 – 51). CAB and RPV plasma concentrations at select visits are summarized in the table. After initial IM doses, mean CAB and RPV troughs were well above their respective in vitro PA-IC90 values (CAB, 0.166 μg/mL; RPV 12 ng/mL). At Week 48, mean CAB troughs were 17x PA-IC90 and between oral CAB 10–30 mg exposures. Similarly, mean RPV troughs were 7x PA-IC90 and remained within the exposure range following oral RPV 25 mg once daily. 80% of RPV steady-state was achieved by Week 48 and 100% for CAB by Week 44. Initial CAB concentrations in females and those with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were lower due to slower absorption but this difference resolved by Week 48. For RPV, there was no absorption difference by gender or BMI. Conclusion CAB and RPV PK were consistent between studies achieving therapeutic concentrations within the first dosing interval that steadily increased over time through Week 48, for both males and females and irrespective of BMI. CAB LA + RPV LA provided compatible PK profiles following monthly IM dosing in a diverse patient population through 48 weeks. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.