Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this trial of preexposure prophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) in men who have sex with men, TDF-FTC was found to be effective in preventing HIV-1 infection when it was taken before sexual activity. The prevention of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2) remains a major public health challenge. 1 Owing to the lack of an effective HIV vaccine, consistent condom use remains the cornerstone of prevention, but biomedical interventions such as male circumcision and the use of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV infection represent additional prevention strategies. 2 – 5 Among the promising interventions is preexposure prophylaxis, in which antiretroviral drugs are started in HIV-negative persons before potential exposure to the virus. Daily oral preexposure prophylaxis with either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or the combination of TDF and . . .

Increased rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are reported among men who have sex with men (MSM) and new interventions are needed. We aimed to assess whether post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with doxycycline could reduce the incidence of chlamydia or syphilis (or both) and whether the meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) could reduce the incidence of gonorrhoea in this population. ANRS 174 DOXYVAC is a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design conducted at ten hospital sites in Paris, France. Eligible participants were MSM aged 18 years or older, HIV negative, had a history of bacterial STIs within the 12 months before enrolment, and who were already included in the ANRS PREVENIR study (a cohort of MSM using pre-exposure prophylaxis with tenofovir and emtricitabine for HIV prevention). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to doxycycline PEP (two pills of 100 mg each orally within 72 h after condomless sex, with no more than three doses of 200 mg per week) or no PEP groups and were also randomly assigned (1:1) to the 4CMenB vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline, Paris, France; two intramuscular injections at enrolment and at 2 months) or no vaccine groups, using a computer-generated randomisation list with a permuted fixed block size of four. Follow-up occurred for at least 12 months (with visits every 3 months) up to 24 months. The coprimary outcomes were the risk of a first episode of chlamydia or syphilis (or both) after the enrolment visit at baseline for the doxycycline intervention and the risk of a first episode of gonorrhoea starting at month 3 (ie, 1 month after the second vaccine dose) for the vaccine intervention, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned participants who had at least one follow-up visit). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04597424 (ongoing). Between Jan 19, 2021, and Sept 19, 2022, 556 participants were randomly assigned. 545 (98%) participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis for the doxycycline PEP and no PEP groups and 544 (98%) were included for the 4CMenB vaccine and no vaccine groups. The median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 9–18). The median age was 40 years (34–48) and all 545 participants were male. There was no interaction between the two interventions (p≥0·1) for the primary outcome. The incidence of a first episode of chlamydia or syphilis (or both) was 8·8 per 100 person-years (35 events in 362 participants) in the doxycycline PEP group and 53·2 per 100 person-years (80 events in 183 participants) in the no PEP group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·17 [95% CI 0·12–0·26]; p<0·0001). The incidence of a first episode of gonorrhoea, starting from month 3 was 58·3 per 100 person-years (103 events in 274 participants) in the 4CmenB vaccine group and 77·1 per 100 person-years (122 events in 270 participants) in the no vaccine group (aHR 0·78 [95% CI 0·60–1·01]; p=0·061). There were no deaths during the study. One drug-related serious adverse event (fixed-drug eruption) occurred in the doxycycline PEP group. Six (2%) participants in the doxycycline group discontinued doxycycline PEP because of gastrointestinal adverse events. Doxycycline PEP strongly reduced the incidence of chlamydia and syphilis in MSM, but we did not show efficacy of the 4CmenB vaccine for gonorrhoea. Doxycycline PEP should be assessed in other populations, such as heterosexual men and women, and its effect on antimicrobial resistance carefully monitored. ANRS Maladies Infectieuses Emergentes. For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Increased rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have been reported among men who have sex with men. We aimed to assess whether post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with doxycycline could reduce the incidence of STIs. All participants attending their scheduled visit in the open-label extension of the ANRS IPERGAY trial in France (men aged 18 years or older having condomless sex with men and using pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine) were eligible for inclusion in this open-label randomised study. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) at a central site to take a single oral dose of 200 mg doxycycline PEP within 24 h after sex or no prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a first STI (gonorrhoea, chlamydia, or syphilis) during the 10-month follow-up. The cumulative probability of occurrence of the primary endpoint was estimated in each group with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The primary efficacy analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population, comprising all randomised participants. All participants received risk-reduction counselling and condoms, and were tested regularly for HIV. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01473472. Between July 20, 2015, and Jan 21, 2016, we randomly assigned 232 participants (n=116 in the doxycycline PEP group and n=116 in the no-PEP group) who were followed up for a median of 8·7 months (IQR 7·8–9·7). Participants in the PEP group used a median of 680 mg doxycycline per month (IQR 280–1450). 73 participants presented with a new STI during follow-up, 28 in the PEP group (9-month probability 22%, 95% CI 15–32) and 45 in the no-PEP group (42%, 33–53; log-rank test p=0·007). The occurrence of a first STI in participants taking PEP was lower than in those not taking PEP (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53; 95% CI 0·33–0·85; p=0·008). Similar results were observed for the occurrence of a first episode of chlamydia (HR 0·30; 95% CI 0·13–0·70; p=0·006) and of syphilis (0·27; 0·07–0·98; p=0·047); for a first episode of gonorrhoea the results did not differ significantly (HR 0·83; 0·47–1·47; p=0·52). No HIV seroconversion was observed, and 72 (71%) of all 102 STIs were asymptomatic. Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported in 62 (53%) participants in the PEP group and 47 (41%) in the no-PEP group (p=0·05). Doxycycline PEP reduced the occurrence of a first episode of bacterial STI in high-risk men who have sex with men. France Recherche Nord & Sud Sida-HIV Hépatites (ANRS) and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recommended in men who have sex with men (MSM). We assessed HAV and HBV vaccine uptake in the non-immune participants and their immunisation during follow-up of the ANRS IPERGAY (Intervention Préventive de l'Exposition aux Risques avec et pour les Gays) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trial.During the ANRS IPERGAY trial among MSM (NCT 01473472), vaccination against HAV and HBV was offered free of charge to all non-immune participants at baseline. We assessed anti-HAV IgGs and anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies (Abs) at baseline, 1–3 months after each vaccine dose and on the last follow-up visit. Vaccination uptake and immunisation were analysed in non-immune participants with at least 6 months of follow-up after the 1st vaccine dose.A total of 427 MSM with a median age of 34.8 years were analysed. Median follow-up was 2.2 years (Q1–Q3, 1.6–2.9). Absence of anti-HAV IgG at baseline (50.4%, 215/427) was associated with younger age (p=0.0001). Among HAV non-immune participants, 96.1% (197/205) received one or more vaccine doses and 91.0% (172/189) received two vaccine doses. Among HBV non-immune participants, 97.6 % (81/83) received one or more vaccine doses and 78.4% (58/74) received three doses. On the last-visit sample, anti-HAV IgG and anti-HBs Abs were respectively detected in 94.8% (95% CI 90.0% to 97.7%) and 79.6% (95% CI 66.5% to 89.4%) of participants with complete vaccination and in 80.0% (95% CI 51.9% to 95.7%) and 40.0% (95% CI 16.3% to 67.7%) of participants with incomplete vaccination.Vaccine acceptability against HAV and HBV infections was very high in MSM starting PrEP. Immunisation was high in participants with a full vaccination scheme. Physicians must consider PrEP visits as major opportunities to propose and complete HAV and HBV vaccination in at-risk non-immune subjects.

ObjectivesWe aimed to assess among men who have sex with men (MSM) risk factors for HIV infection, to identify those who require urgent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescription.MethodsAll participants enrolled in the placebo arm of the ANRS IPERGAY trial, or infected between screening and day 0, were included. Baseline characteristics were described and HIV incidence rate ratios (RRs) were estimated with their 95% CIs.Results203 MSM were included with a median follow-up of 9 months. During the study period, 16 participants acquired HIV infection while not receiving tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabin (TDF/FTC) over 212.4 person-years (PYs) of follow-up (incidence rate 7.5/100 PYs, 95% CI: 4.3 to 12.2). Being enrolled in Paris was associated with a significant increased risk of HIV infection (RR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.1 to 28.3). A high number of sexual partners in prior 2 months (≥10 vs <5) and of condomless receptive anal sex episodes in prior 12 months (>5 vs <5) were strong predictors for HIV acquisition (RR: 10.6 (2 to 260.2) and 3.3 (1.2 to 10.2), respectively). Those who reported more often or only receptive sexual practices were also at increased risk (RR: 9.8 (2.0 to 246.6)). The use of recreational drugs in prior 12 months, especially gamma hydroxybutarate/gamma butyrolactone (RR: 5.9; 95% CI: 2 to 21.7), was associated with a significantly increased risk of HIV acquisition even after adjustment for sexual practices.ConclusionsMSM who have frequent condomless receptive anal sex and multiple partners, or use recreational drugs should be targeted in priority for PrEP prescription especially if they live in an area with a high prevalence of HIV infection.

Background To obtain reliable clinical data of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O (HIV-1/O) infection, and immunovirological responses to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), in a large series of 101 patients. Methods Piecewise linear models were used to estimate CD4 count before and after cART initiation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to reach clinical stage C before antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to analyze time to achieve a plasma viral load (pVL) <40 copies/mL following cART initiation. Immunovirological response was assessed at the most recent visit in patients on active follow-up. Results Data showed a 16.6% cumulative probability of reaching stage C within 5 years following diagnosis, and a mean CD4 decrease of –30.5 cells/μL/year. cART initiation in ART-naive patients led to a mean CD4 gain of 147 cells/μL after 12 months, and to a median pVL of <40 copies/mL after 3.8 months for 89.3%. Initiation with a nonrecommended nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–based vs a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor–based regimen resulted in a much smaller gain of around 100 CD4 cells/μL after 1 year. Patients on follow-up since 2007 had a median CD4 count of 498 cells/μL, and 87% had a pVL <40 copies/mL at the most recent follow-up visit. Conclusions This work provides unique data on HIV-1/O infection, in favor of a milder natural evolution than HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) and of a highly efficient current management, based on HIV-1/M guidelines, despite genetic divergence. Studies of comparable HIV-1/M and HIV-1/O populations are needed to confirm these results.

ObjectivesPartner notification (PN) is a useful public health approach to enhance targeted testing of people at high risk of HIV and other STIs, and subsequent linkage to care for those diagnosed. In France, no specific PN guidelines exist and information about current practices is scarce. We used the ANRS-IPERGAY PrEP trial to investigate PN in HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) reporting a bacterial STI.MethodsThis substudy included 275 participants who completed a specific online PN questionnaire during the open-label extension study of the ANRS-Intervention Préventive de l’Exposition aux Risques avec et pour les Gays (IPERGAY) trial. Variables used as proxies of at-risk practices were defined using data collected at the previous follow-up visit about participants’ most recent sexual encounter and preventive behaviours. χ2 or Fisher’s exact test helped select variables eligible for multiple logistic models.ResultsOf the 275 participants, 250 reported at least one previous STI. Among the latter, 172 (68.8%) had informed their partner(s) of their most recent STI. Of these, 138 (80.2%) and 83 (48.3%) had notified their casual and main partners, respectively. Participants were less likely to notify their main partner when their most recent sexual encounter involved unsafe anal sex with a casual partner (adjusted OR (aOR) (95% CI) 0.18 (0.06 to 0.54), P=0.02). Older participants were less likely to inform casual partners (aOR (95% CI) 0.44 (0.21 to 0.94), P=0.03), while those practising chemsex during their most recent sexual encounter were more likely to inform their casual partners (aOR (95% CI) 2.56 (1.07 to 6.09), P=0.03).ConclusionUnsafe sexual encounters with people other than main partners and street drugs use were two sociobehavioural factors identified, respectively, as a barrier to main PN and a motivator for casual PN, in a sample of high-risk MSM. These results provide an insight into current PN practices regarding STI in France and might inform future decisions about how to define feasible and acceptable PN programmes.

We evaluated the impact of on-demand oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1/2 incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) enrolled in the ANRS IPERGAY trial. Serum samples were tested at baseline and at the last visit for HSV-1/2 antibodies. Overall HSV-1 incidence was 11.7 per 100 person-years; 16.2 and 7.8 per 100 person-years in the TDF/FTC and placebo arm, respectively (P = .19). Overall HSV-2 incidence was 7.6 per 100 person-years; 8.1 and 7.0 per 100 person-years in the TDF/FTC and placebo arm, respectively (P = .75). On-demand oral PrEP with TDF/FTC failed to reduce HSV-1/2 incidence in this population.