Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
86
result(s) for
"السياسيون مقابلات"
Sort by:
حديث الكبار للتاريخ = The talk of the great
يتناول كتاب (حديث الكبار للتاريخ) والذي قام بتأليفه (ناصر الدين النشاشيبي) في حوالي (479) صفحة من القطع المتوسط المحتويات التالية : سفير فوق العادة وفوق المألوف، الشيخ زايد يقول كل شيء، فهد الجزيرة العربية قال لي، من قتل فيصل بن عبد العزيز؟، مع الحسين، مضر بدران، مع صدام حسين، مع ضياء الحق أو ضياع الحكم، مع أقدر وأذكى وأجرأ سياسي في أمريكا، ديكتاتور آسيا يتكلم، حوار الدبلوماسي الذي لا يؤمن بالديبلوماسية.
Persuasion in Political TV. Interviews through Facial Movements
During interaction, nonverbal way of communication could be used by the interlocutors. They are a crucial aspect of interlocutors' daily conversation and interaction. The study's aims to investigate the significance of facial expressions and how they affect discussions. The purpose of this research is to look into facial expressions and their significance in the persuasion process during political interviews. The study is founded on the ideas that many interlocutors utilize facial expressions as a persuasive tool in interactions with others to express emotions, thoughts, and attitudes, as well as fulfill their purposes and persuade individuals of specific messages. To achieve the aims of this study, two sorts of approaches were used: theoretical and practical. The theoretical approaches entail explaining the fundamental concepts of persuasion and nonverbal communication. The practical processes, on the other hand, entail examining recorded films of two political interviews of different politicians. The videos were collected from the YouTube channel. The selected interviews were evaluated using an eclectic model based on Cialdini's (2001) model of persuasion techniques, Matsumoto's (2013) model of universal facial expression forms and functions, and Argyle and Dean's (1965) model of eye contact functions. The results of analyzing the collected data demonstrate that both interlocutors, interviewer and interviewee, commonly employ facial expressions as persuasive methods in political TV interviews. The interviewer has an impact on the guest and persuades him to speak candidly. The guest, on the other hand, employs facial expressions to convey his point of view, intentions, and feelings to the interviewer and audience. According to the findings, the function of information seeking is the most important function of eye contact, followed by the functions of happiness and liking, which are utilized as persuasion methods. Based on the study findings, the study concluded with a number of recommendations and suggestions for further research.
Journal Article
A Pragmatic Study of Courtesy In Selected American Political Interviews
This study investigates courtesy in American political interviews through three speech acts, namely, compliment, praising and thanking. The main hypotheses of the study are: (1) courtesy can be regarded as a way to show considerations and polite behaviours; (2) courteous expressions are presented by several speech acts to show considerations in American political interviews; (3) compliment is the mostly performed way to show courtesy in American political interviews. To test the validity of these hypotheses, these procedures will be followed: (1) surveying the relevant literature on courtesy; (2) analysing the data of the study which is represented by four American political interviews by adopting Searle's (1969) model, the extracts are taken from American political interviewees' speech that contains courteous expressions .The total number of the extracts is fourteen.
Journal Article
A Sociopragmatic Study of Accusing in Trump's and Clinton's Political Interviews
Accusing is an intentional act that can be achieved in certain attitudes. The accuser thinks that the accused has done something wrong. The speech act of accusing has been tackled in law and in police officer's false accusation, but it has not been tackled sociopragmatically. So, the present study deals with accusing sociopragmatically in American political interviews. The study aims at: Identifying the sociopragmatic structure of accusing, finding out the speech acts that employed by the accuser and which one is the most frequent, pinpointing the most frequently sociolinguistic variables used in American Political Interviews, specifying the types of accusing and which one is more common in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, exploring the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews. To achieve the aims of the study, it is hypothesized that: Accusing is a process contains three stages, initiating stage, developing stage and completing stage, the speech act of statement is the most frequent in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, Position is highly utilized by Trump while gender is highly used by Hillary as a sociolinguistic variable, direct accusing is the common type of accusing used by Trump while indirect accusing the common type used by Hillary, attack is the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews.
Journal Article
الدكتور يحيى الجمل : شاهد على العصر
يتناول الكتاب سرد دقيق لمحتوى الحوار الذي تم مع الدكتور يحيى الجمل حيث تناول الحوار مناقشة موضوعات متعددة تحت عناوين \"عصر المتناقضات\" و\"معركتي بين الأدب والقانون\" و\"يحيى الجمل والوفد\" و\"توفيق الحكيم وسقطة العمر\" و\"مصر التي في خاطري\" و\"ثورة يوليو أعادت مصر إلى مصر\" و\"بين الثورة والنكسة\" و\"لا حل لنا غير الوحدة\" و\"سيادة القانون تبدأ من الحاجب\" و\"وظيفة الدولة أن تمنحنا الأمان\" و\"المصري وآفة الكسل\".
BOOK