Explore the vast range of titles available.

Politeness is an interpersonal system that facilitates people's interaction. It reflects participants' awareness of each others' needs, desires and interests. Moreover, it helps managing the conversation in harmony. One form of utilizing politeness is expressing the personal opinion while evaluating, criticizing, or commenting specific issues, especially in politics. To this end, the researcher opines to choose latest Noam Chomsky's political interviews and detecting the use of politeness strategies by him, while criticizing, commenting or estimatating the current circumstances. The researcher analyizes eight extract from seven political interviews with Noam Chomsky in 2022 basing on Brown and Levinson's modal of politeness (1987). The findings of the study indicates that the most frequently politeness super strategy is positive politeness. Furthrrmore,, the dominant politeness sub strategies are detected by the researcher. Noam Chomsky uses specific politeness sub strategies more than others, these are: being ironic, including the hearer in the activity, Intensify hearer's interest, needs, and goods.

During interaction, nonverbal way of communication could be used by the interlocutors. They are a crucial aspect of interlocutors' daily conversation and interaction. The study's aims to investigate the significance of facial expressions and how they affect discussions. The purpose of this research is to look into facial expressions and their significance in the persuasion process during political interviews. The study is founded on the ideas that many interlocutors utilize facial expressions as a persuasive tool in interactions with others to express emotions, thoughts, and attitudes, as well as fulfill their purposes and persuade individuals of specific messages. To achieve the aims of this study, two sorts of approaches were used: theoretical and practical. The theoretical approaches entail explaining the fundamental concepts of persuasion and nonverbal communication. The practical processes, on the other hand, entail examining recorded films of two political interviews of different politicians. The videos were collected from the YouTube channel. The selected interviews were evaluated using an eclectic model based on Cialdini's (2001) model of persuasion techniques, Matsumoto's (2013) model of universal facial expression forms and functions, and Argyle and Dean's (1965) model of eye contact functions. The results of analyzing the collected data demonstrate that both interlocutors, interviewer and interviewee, commonly employ facial expressions as persuasive methods in political TV interviews. The interviewer has an impact on the guest and persuades him to speak candidly. The guest, on the other hand, employs facial expressions to convey his point of view, intentions, and feelings to the interviewer and audience. According to the findings, the function of information seeking is the most important function of eye contact, followed by the functions of happiness and liking, which are utilized as persuasion methods. Based on the study findings, the study concluded with a number of recommendations and suggestions for further research.

This study investigates courtesy in American political interviews through three speech acts, namely, compliment, praising and thanking. The main hypotheses of the study are: (1) courtesy can be regarded as a way to show considerations and polite behaviours; (2) courteous expressions are presented by several speech acts to show considerations in American political interviews; (3) compliment is the mostly performed way to show courtesy in American political interviews. To test the validity of these hypotheses, these procedures will be followed: (1) surveying the relevant literature on courtesy; (2) analysing the data of the study which is represented by four American political interviews by adopting Searle's (1969) model, the extracts are taken from American political interviewees' speech that contains courteous expressions .The total number of the extracts is fourteen.

Accusing is an intentional act that can be achieved in certain attitudes. The accuser thinks that the accused has done something wrong. The speech act of accusing has been tackled in law and in police officer's false accusation, but it has not been tackled sociopragmatically. So, the present study deals with accusing sociopragmatically in American political interviews. The study aims at: Identifying the sociopragmatic structure of accusing, finding out the speech acts that employed by the accuser and which one is the most frequent, pinpointing the most frequently sociolinguistic variables used in American Political Interviews, specifying the types of accusing and which one is more common in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, exploring the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews. To achieve the aims of the study, it is hypothesized that: Accusing is a process contains three stages, initiating stage, developing stage and completing stage, the speech act of statement is the most frequent in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, Position is highly utilized by Trump while gender is highly used by Hillary as a sociolinguistic variable, direct accusing is the common type of accusing used by Trump while indirect accusing the common type used by Hillary, attack is the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews.

DEVELOPMENT POLICY | POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT | POLITICAL SYSTEMS | POLITICAL CONDITIONS | INTERVIEWS | UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.

L'interview est le genre médiatique, par excellence, permettant aux hommes politiques de partager leurs idées, opinions et projets avec leur public. La construction communicationnelle de l'interview fait que le journaliste doit tirer le maximum d'informations de son invité en lui posant des questions, ceci peut mettre à mal son image. Dans cette étude, qui s'inscrit dans le domaine de l'analyse des interactions verbales, il sera question de vérifier, à travers l'analyse d'interviews du président Algérien dédiées à la chaine France 24 et la chaine Aljazeera, en s'appuyant sur le modèle de politesse élaboré par P. Brown et S. Levinson aménagé par C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, si la politesse linguistique a sa place dans ce genre de discours à caractère conflictuel, d'une part, et d'étudier les procédés utilisés par les interactants pour minimiser le risque de conflits et faciliter l'interaction, d'autre part.

One of the most popular methods of political communication worldwide, televised political interviews may still impact and reach far larger audiences than any other type of public speaking. Interviews on television give politicians the ideal opportunity to address a large audience directly. The current study investigates bias within TV interview of Piers Morgan regarding the Palestinian issue. Hidden prejudice and bias are responsible for the kind of language and vocabulary use through which the hostile hatred towards sex, race, religion, ethnicity and so forth which cannot be understood within isolated expression without relying on the context to eventually figure out the pragmatic function behind. The study is qualitative in nature, using Piers Morgan's interview with the Palestinian ambassador Husam Zomlot on October the 19th as the text of analysis by using three modals (Fairclough's (1989), Van Dijk's (2006), Brisard, Ostman, Verschueren's (2009) Pragmatic Function). The number of the utterances to be analysed are twenty (the whole speech). The results show that the speaker tends to use explicit strategy of bias in most of his speech (with 24 frequency and 65% percentage) to persuade and influence others perspectives and point of view to confess that Israel is a nation and Palestine is their homeland. Extreme explicit conscious bias is defined by overtly discriminatory behaviour, which can take the form of verbal and physical abuse or more covert tactics like exclusion and control and this what exactly happens within the interview under investigation by which Morgan intentionally uses words and expressions that demean Palestinian people and condemn Hamas of Tufan Al-Aqsa (i.e., Al-Aqsa) which took place at the event of October, the 7th, 2023.

استعرض المقال حوار جريدة \"\"لوموند\"\" مع عالم الاجتماع والفيلسوف (إدغار موران) حول اغتيال صاموئيل باتي: \"\"الأخطر هو أن تنقسم فرنسا إلى اثنتين تُعارض الواحدة منهما الأخرى\"\". وجاء الحوار في عدة أسئلة ومنها، ما رأيك في إعادة نشر الرسوم الكاريكاتورية للنبي محمد واستخداماتها التعليمية والسياسية والأيديولوجية بصورة خاصة، وهل يمكن تبرير أن الكتاب والنقاد والوزراء يجادلون بأن اليسار الإسلامي يُسلح الإرهاب فكريا، وهل يمكن لصدام الأميركتين أن ينذر بنزاع بين فرنستين خلال الانتخابات الرئاسية المقبلة، وما العمل في المجال التربوي وخصوصا في المدارس. واختتم الحوار بذِكر السؤال التالي هل يمكن جعل ما هو مستبعد يحدث في فرنسا، وأجاب روزا قائلا على هذا السؤال \"\" أنا أؤمن بضرورة تنظيم وتوحيد واحات المقاومة في الحياة والفكر ومواصلة إظهار إمكان تغيير المسار، وتجنب إغراق أنفسنا في رذائل الفكر الذي نندد به، ولقد اختبرت السير في أثناء النوم في المسيرة نحو الكارثة في ثلاثينيات القرن الماضي، ومع أن المخاطر مختلفة تماما اليوم إلا أنها ليست أقل خطورة وأي سير جديد ونحن نيام سيخضعنا وسنصبح تجسيداً للصيغة التي وضعها هرقليطس \"\"مستيقظون يخلدون للنوم\"\". كُتب هذا المستخلص من قِبل دار المنظومة 2021\"