Explore the vast range of titles available.

An anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail was given to patients within 3 days after PCR confirmation of Covid-19. In patients who were antibody-negative at baseline, treatment was associated with rapid viral clearance and potentially with a less frequent need for medical attention. The effect was less marked among patients who were antibody-positive at baseline.

Isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved in combination with pomalidomide–dexamethasone and carfilzomib–dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This phase 3, open-label study compared the efficacy of isatuximab plus carfilzomib–dexamethasone versus carfilzomib–dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. This was a prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 study done at 69 study centres in 16 countries across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma aged at least 18 years who had received one to three previous lines of therapy and had measurable serum or urine M-protein were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to isatuximab plus carfilzomib–dexamethasone (isatuximab group) or carfilzomib–dexamethasone (control group). Patients in the isatuximab group received isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for the first 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks. Both groups received the approved schedule of intravenous carfilzomib and oral or intravenous dexamethasone. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population according to assigned treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose according to treatment received. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03275285. Between Nov 15, 2017, and March 21, 2019, 302 patients with a median of two previous lines of therapy were enrolled. 179 were randomly assigned to the isatuximab group and 123 to the control group. Median progression-free survival was not reached in the isatuximab group compared with 19·15 months (95% CI 15·77–not reached) in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0·53 (99% CI 0·32–0·89; one-sided p=0·0007). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade 3 or worse occurred in 136 (77%) of 177 patients in the isatuximab group versus 82 (67%) of 122 in the control group, serious TEAEs occurred in 105 (59%) versus 70 (57%) patients, and TEAEs led to discontinuation in 15 (8%) versus 17 (14%) patients. Fatal TEAEs during study treatment occurred in six (3%) versus four (3%) patients. The addition of isatuximab to carfilzomib–dexamethasone significantly improves progression-free survival and depth of response in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, representing a new standard of care for this patient population. Sanofi. [Display omitted]

In two trials involving patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, the anti-CD20+ monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was associated with lower annualized relapse rates, lower risk of disability progression, and better MRI features than interferon beta-1a. Despite the availability of several disease-modifying treatments for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, patients often continue to have clinical and subclinical disease activity, and neurologic disability continues to accrue. Thus, there is a need for more effective treatments with acceptable safety profiles. 1 – 3 B cells are thought to influence the underlying pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis by means of antigen presentation, 4 autoantibody production, 5 , 6 cytokine regulation, 4 and the formation of ectopic lymphoid aggregates in the meninges, which possibly contribute to cortical demyelination and neurodegeneration. 7 , 8 Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets CD20, a cell-surface antigen that is expressed . . .

This study of ANCA-associated vasculitis compared a single course of rituximab with conventional immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine and showed similar results for the primary outcome of complete remission by 6 months, maintained through 18 months. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (previously termed Wegener's granulomatosis) and microscopic polyangiitis are called antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides because they are frequently accompanied by autoantibodies against proteinase 3 or myeloperoxidase. 1 , 2 For nearly four decades, cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the standard therapy for the induction of remission. However, the primary results of the Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial 3 and results from a European trial 4 showed that rituximab was as effective as cyclophosphamide for the induction of remission in patients with severe disease. Moreover, the rituximab-based regimen was superior in patients who had relapsing disease at 6 months. 3 Rituximab has . . .

Among participants with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 32% had remission at weeks 36 and 48 when treated with mepolizumab, an anti–interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, as compared with 3% of the participants in the placebo group. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly known as the Churg–Strauss syndrome) is characterized by asthma, sinusitis, pulmonary infiltrates, neuropathy, and eosinophilic vasculitis of one or more end-organs. 1 – 4 Eosinophils are thought to induce pathogenic effects in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis by means of tissue and vascular infiltration and inflammation through a variety of mediators. 5 , 6 Although systemic glucocorticoids form the cornerstone of treatment for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 7 – 9 most patients remain dependent on glucocorticoid therapy, and relapses are common. 10 – 13 Furthermore, some patients do not have a sufficient response to glucocorticoids. Because recurrent relapses place the patient at . . .

In patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, the use of inhaled recombinant granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor resulted in a significantly better alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient at 25 weeks than the use of placebo. The beneficial effect was not observed in smokers.

Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating rare disease, often accompanied by high treatment burden and with an unmet need for more efficacious and well tolerated treatments. Zilucoplan is a subcutaneous, self-administered macrocyclic peptide complement C5 inhibitor. We aimed to assess safety, efficacy, and tolerability of zilucoplan in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR)-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. RAISE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 75 sites in Europe, Japan, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged 18–74 years) with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America disease class II–IV), a myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score of least 6, and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg once daily by self-injection, or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in MG-ADL score in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dosing MG-ADL score). Safety was mainly assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients who had received at least one dose of zilucoplan or placebo. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04115293. An open-label extension study is ongoing (NCT04225871). Between Sept 17, 2019, and Sept 10, 2021, 239 patients were screened for the study, of whom 174 (73%) were eligible. 86 (49%) patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg and 88 (51%) were assigned to placebo. Patients assigned to zilucoplan showed a greater reduction in MG-ADL score from baseline to week 12, compared with those assigned to placebo (least squares mean change −4·39 [95% CI –5·28 to –3·50] vs −2·30 [–3·17 to –1·43]; least squares mean difference −2·09 [−3·24 to −0·95]; p=0·0004). TEAEs occurred in 66 (77%) patients in the zilucoplan group and in 62 (70%) patients in the placebo group. The most common TEAE was injection-site bruising (n=14 [16%] in the zilucoplan group and n=8 [9%] in the placebo group). Incidences of serious TEAEs and serious infections were similar in both groups. One patient died in each group; neither death (COVID-19 [zilucoplan] and cerebral haemorrhage [placebo]) was considered related to the study drug. Zilucoplan treatment showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis-specific efficacy outcomes, had a favourable safety profile, and was well tolerated, with no major safety findings. Zilucoplan is a new potential treatment option for a broad population of patients with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. The long-term safety and efficacy of zilucoplan is being assessed in an ongoing open-label extension study. UCB Pharma.

In a randomized, controlled trial involving patients with membranous nephropathy, rituximab was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria at 12 months and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission for up to 24 months.

In patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, responses to treatment are rare and usually minor. Teprotumumab, an antibody to the insulin-like growth factor I receptor, led to significant responses in 69% of patients and to decreased proptosis. Medical therapies for moderate-to-severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (Graves’ orbitopathy) that have proved to be effective and safe in adequately powered, prospective, placebo-controlled trials are lacking. This unmet need is due to the incompletely understood pathogenesis of the disease. 1 Current treatments are inconsistently beneficial and often associated with side effects, and their modification of the ultimate disease outcome is uncertain. 1 – 3 Previous clinical trials, which were rarely placebo-controlled, suggest that high-dose glucocorticoids, alone 3 – 5 or with radiotherapy, 6 , 7 can reduce inflammation-related signs and symptoms in patients with active ophthalmopathy. However, glucocorticoids and orbital radiotherapy minimally affect proptosis and can cause dose-limiting adverse . . .

In this randomized trial, patients with vasculitides who were in complete remission after initial induction therapy received either rituximab at intervals or daily azathioprine. More patients had sustained remission with rituximab than with azathioprine. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly called Wegener’s granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis, and renal-limited antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides are the main ANCA-associated vasculitis variants. 1 Although these entities differ in their pathogenesis, genetics, and serotypes, severe forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis share several clinical features and currently have similar treatments. 2 – 6 A staged therapeutic strategy that combines glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide to induce remission has dramatically improved survival over the past few decades, but with frequent early and late side effects. The results of two trials (RAVE and RITUXVAS) showed that rituximab was not inferior to daily oral or pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide for the induction . . .