Explore the vast range of titles available.

This preclinical, phase 2 report shows that VX-445, a CFTR potentiator when administered with tezacaftor and ivacaftor, improved lung function and reduced sweat chloride concentrations and symptoms in patients harboring one or two Phe508del alleles.

This companion article to the VX-445 report shows that VX-659, a new CFTR potentiator, when administered with tezacaftor and ivacaftor improved lung function, sweat chloride concentration, and symptoms in patients with cystic fibrosis who harbored one or two Phe508del alleles.

In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from single-group and randomized phase 2 trials suggest that treatment with FTD-TPI in addition to bevacizumab has the potential to extend survival. We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adult patients who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer to receive FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab (combination group) or FTD-TPI alone (FTD-TPI group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety, including the time to worsening of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more (on a scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability). A total of 246 patients were assigned to each group. The median overall survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.77; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54; P<0.001). The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The median time to worsening of the ECOG performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.67). Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in longer overall survival than FTD-TPI alone. (Funded by Servier and Taiho Oncology; SUNLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04737187; EudraCT number, 2020-001976-14.).

Triple treatment with elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis who had one Phe508del allele and a minimal-function mutation resulted in sustained improvement in FEV 1 , sweat chloride concentration, and the number of pulmonary exacerbations.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators correct the basic defect caused by CFTR mutations. Improvements in health outcomes have been achieved with the combination of a CFTR corrector and potentiator in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation. The addition of elexacaftor (VX-445), a next-generation CFTR corrector, to tezacaftor plus ivacaftor further improved F508del-CFTR function and clinical outcomes in a phase 2 study in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial of elexacaftor in combination with tezacaftor plus ivacaftor was done at 44 sites in four countries. Eligible participants were those with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation, aged 12 years or older with stable disease, and with a percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) of 40–90%, inclusive. After a 4-week tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in period, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 4 weeks of elexacaftor 200 mg orally once daily plus tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h versus tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h alone. The primary outcome was the absolute change from baseline (measured at the end of the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in) in ppFEV1 at week 4. Key secondary outcomes were absolute change in sweat chloride and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain (CFQ-R RD) score. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03525548. Between Aug 3 and Dec 28, 2018, 113 participants were enrolled. Following the run-in, 107 participants were randomly assigned (55 in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and 52 in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group) and completed the 4-week treatment period. The elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group had improvements in the primary outcome of ppFEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] treatment difference of 10·0 percentage points [95% CI 7·4 to 12·6], p<0·0001) and the key secondary outcomes of sweat chloride concentration (LSM treatment difference −45·1 mmol/L [95% CI −50·1 to −40·1], p<0·0001), and CFQ-R RD score (LSM treatment difference 17·4 points [95% CI 11·8 to 23·0], p<0·0001) compared with the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group. The triple combination regimen was well tolerated, with no discontinuations. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; serious adverse events occurred in two (4%) participants receiving elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor and in one (2%) receiving tezacaftor plus ivacaftor. Elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor provided clinically robust benefit compared with tezacaftor plus ivacaftor alone, with a favourable safety profile, and shows the potential to lead to transformative improvements in the lives of people with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the F508del mutation. Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

In November 2019 givosiran became the second small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based drug to receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, it has been developed for the treatment of acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), a disorder characterized by life-threatening acute neurovisceral attacks. The porphyrias are a group of disorders in which enzymatic deficiencies in heme production lead to toxic accumulation of delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG), which are involved in the neurovisceral attacks. Givosiran acts as a conventional siRNA to trigger RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated gene silencing on delta-ALA synthase 1 (ALAS1), thus returning ALA and PBG metabolites to the physiological level to attenuate further neurotoxicity. Givosiran makes use of a new hepatic-delivery system that conjugates three GalNac ( N -acetylgalactosamine) molecules to the siRNA passenger strand. GalNac binds to the liver asialoglycoprotein receptor, favoring the internalization of these GalNac-conjugated siRNAs into the hepatic cells. In a phase I study, subcutaneous monthly administration of givosiran 2.5 mg/kg reduced > 90% of ALA and PBG content. This siRNA is being analyzed in ENVISION (NCT03338816), a phase III, multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial. In preliminary results, givosiran achieved clinical endpoints for AIP, reducing urinary ALA levels, and presented a safety profile that enabled further drug development. The clinical performance of givosiran revealed that suppression of ALAS1 by GalNac-decorated siRNAs represents an additional approach for the treatment of patients with AIP that manifests recurrent acute neurovisceral attacks.

Abstract Study Objectives Post hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of daridorexant on sleep architecture in people with insomnia, focusing on features associated with hyperarousal. Methods We studied sleep architecture in adults with chronic insomnia disorder from two randomized phase 3 clinical studies (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03545191 and NCT03575104) investigating 3 months of daridorexant treatment (placebo, daridorexant 25 mg, daridorexant 50 mg). We analyzed sleep–wake transition probabilities, EEG spectra, and sleep spindle properties including density, dispersion, and slow oscillation phase coupling. The wake EEG similarity index (WESI) was determined using a machine learning algorithm analyzing the spectral profile of the EEG. Results At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg decreased wake-to-wake transition probabilities (p < .05) and increased the probability of transitions from wake-to-N1 (p < .05), N2 (p < .05), and REM sleep (p < .05), as well as from N1-to-N2 (p < .05) compared to baseline and placebo. Daridorexant 50 mg decreased relative beta power during wake (p = .011) and N1 (p < .001) compared to baseline and placebo. During the wake, relative alpha power decreased (p < .001) and relative delta power increased (p < .001) compared to placebo. Daridorexant did not alter EEG spectra bands in N2, N3, and REM stages or in sleep spindle activity. Daridorexant decreased the WESI score during wake compared to baseline (p = .004). Effects with 50 mg were consistent between months 1 and 3 and less pronounced with 25 mg. Conclusions Daridorexant reduced EEG features associated with hyperarousal as indicated by reduced wake-to-wake transition probabilities and enhanced spectral features associated with drowsiness and sleep during wake and N1. Clinical Trials ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03545191: study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants with insomnia disorder. URL: Study Details | study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants with insomnia disorder | ClinicalTrials.gov ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03575104: study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants who experience difficulties sleeping. URL: study details | study to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-541468 (daridorexant) in adult and elderly participants who experience difficulties sleeping | ClinicalTrials.gov Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive lung disease with poor prognosis and a significant unmet medical need. This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and target engagement in the lungs, of GSK3008348, a novel inhaled alpha-v beta-6 (αvβ6) integrin inhibitor, in participants with IPF. Methods This was a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind (sponsor unblind) study, conducted in the UK (two clinical sites, one imaging unit) between June 2017 and July 2018 (NCT03069989). Participants with a definite or probable diagnosis of IPF received a single nebulised dose of 1000 mcg GSK3008348 or placebo (ratio 5:2) in two dosing periods. In period 1, safety and PK assessments were performed up to 24 h post-dose; in period 2, after a 7-day to 28-day washout, participants underwent a total of three positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline, Day 1 (~ 30 min post-dosing) and Day 2 (~ 24 h post-dosing), using a radiolabelled αvβ6-specific ligand, [ 18 F]FB-A20FMDV2. The primary endpoint was whole lung volume of distribution (V T ), not corrected for air volume, at ~ 30 min post-dose compared with pre-dose. The study success criterion, determined using Bayesian analysis, was a posterior probability (true % reduction in V T  > 0%) of ≥80%. Results Eight participants with IPF were enrolled and seven completed the study. Adjusted posterior median reduction in uncorrected V T at ~ 30 min after GSK3008348 inhalation was 20% (95% CrI: − 9 to 42%). The posterior probability that the true % reduction in V T  > 0% was 93%. GSK3008348 was well tolerated with no reports of serious adverse events or clinically significant abnormalities that were attributable to study treatment. PK was successfully characterised showing rapid absorption followed by a multiphasic elimination. Conclusions This study demonstrated engagement of the αvβ6 integrin target in the lung following nebulised dosing with GSK3008348 to participants with IPF. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time a target-specific PET radioligand has been used to assess target engagement in the lung, not least for an inhaled drug. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03069989 ; date of registration: 3 March 2017.

Abstract Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer often have poor or short responses to currently available therapies. Drug repurposing with alternative dosing schedules may offer unexpected clinical benefit, even for agents that previously failed for this indication. Methods We explored a high-dose treatment strategy for sunitinib, assessing its potential for both cancer cell killing and inducing immunogenic cell death in patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a randomized clinical trial, we studied the efficacy of high-dose intermittent sunitinib (700 mg once every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced CRC compared to standard therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included overall survival, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results While high, intermittent dosing was found to effectively kill PDTOs in vitro, no support for immunogenic cell death was found. In our clinical trial, among a total of 63 evaluable patients, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 0.9-4.7) for the investigation arm compared to 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6-2.3) for the trifluridine/tipiracil group (P = .78, HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.73-2.04). The trial was halted prematurely due to toxicities: in particular, hemorrhage, fever and gastrointestinal adverse events. Conclusion High-dose intermittent sunitinib treatment did not improve PFS for patients with heavily pretreated mCRC compared to standard 3rd or 4th-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil, whereas significant toxicity was observed. In addition, this approach provoked no relevant immunological responses in vitro, discouraging further research for potential combinations with immunotherapeutics. Identifier NCT03909724

CAPItello-291 is an ongoing phase 3 trial in which capivasertib–fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo–fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after aromatase inhibitor treatment, in both the overall population and in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. This study further explored patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, symptoms, and symptom tolerability in CAPItello-291. This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which was conducted across 193 hospitals and cancer centres in 19 countries, enrolled women with any menopausal status or men, aged ≥18 years (≥20 years in Japan), with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 or 6 inhibitor therapy. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/WHO performance score of 0 or 1 and could have received up to two previous lines of endocrine therapy and up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (stratified according to the presence or absence of liver metastases, previous use of a CDK4/6 inhibitor [yes vs no], and geographical region) to receive oral capivasertib 400 mg (twice daily for 4 days, followed by 3 days off) plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (every 14 days for the first three injections, then every 28 days) or placebo with matching fulvestrant dosing. The dual primary endpoint of the trial was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module (QLQ-C30) and breast module (QLQ-BR23), Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and Patient Global Impression of Treatment Tolerability (PGI-TT) questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Evaluation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 were secondary endpoints and evaluation of PRO-CTCAE and PGI-TT were pre-defined exploratory endpoints, and these endpoints are the subject of analysis in this Article. Data were collected at baseline and prespecified timepoints. Patient-reported outcomes were analysed in all randomly assigned patients with an evaluable baseline assessment and at least one evaluable post-baseline assessment. Change from baseline was assessed using mixed model with repeated measures for EORTC QLQ-C30 and summarised for QLQ-BR23. Time to deterioration was described using the Kaplan–Meier method. PGI-TT and PRO-CTCAE responses were summarised at each treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were not prospectively powered for statistical comparison. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04305496. Between June 2, 2020, and Oct 13, 2021, 901 patients were enrolled, of whom 708 patients were randomly assigned to receive capivasertib–fulvestrant (n=355) or placebo–fulvestrant (n=353). The median age of the patients was 59 years (IQR 51–67) in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group and 58 years (IQR 49–66) in the placebo–fulvestrant group. At data cutoff (Aug 15, 2022), the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival in censored patients was 13·0 months (IQR 9·1–16·7) for capivasertib–fulvestrant and 12·7 months (IQR 2·0–16·4) for placebo–fulvestrant in the overall population. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL) scores were maintained from baseline and were similar between treatment groups throughout the study period (difference in mean change from baseline of −2·5 [95% CI −4·5 to −0·6] with capivasertib–fulvestrant vs −5·6 [−7·9 to −3·4] with placebo–fulvestrant; treatment difference 3·1 [95% CI 0·2 to 6·0]). Median time to deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL was 24·9 months (95% CI 13·8 to not reached) in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group and 12·0 months (10·2 to 15·7) in the placebo–fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·53 to 0·92). Time to deterioration HRs for all EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 subscale scores showed little difference between the treatment groups, except for diarrhoea, which was worse in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group than in the placebo–fulvestrant group (HR 2·75, 95% CI 2·01–3·81). In PRO-CTCAE symptom assessment, the proportion of patients reporting loose and watery stools “frequently” or “almost constantly” was 29% higher at cycle 1, day 15 in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group than in the placebo–fulvestrant group, decreasing at subsequent cycles. Other PRO-CTCAE-reported symptoms (rash, mouth or throat sores, itchy skin, and numbness or tingling in hands or feet) were absent or mild in most patients in both groups throughout treatment. According to the PGI-TT, most patients in both groups reported “not at all” or “a little bit” of bother from treatment side-effects. Patient-reported outcomes from CAPItello-291 demonstrated that capivasertib–fulvestrant delayed time to deterioration of GHS/QOL and maintained other dimensions of HRQOL (except symptoms of diarrhoea) similarly to fulvestrant. With the clinical efficacy and manageable safety profile, these exploratory results further support the positive benefit–risk profile of capivasertib–fulvestrant in this population. AstraZeneca.