Explore the vast range of titles available.

MET (also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor) signalling is a key driver of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Given that no optimal therapy for metastatic PRCC exists, we aimed to compare an existing standard of care, sunitinib, with the MET kinase inhibitors cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of patients with PRCC. We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 65 centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic PRCC who had received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed and MET-directed agents). Patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib, with stratification by receipt of previous therapy and PRCC subtype. All drug doses were administered orally: sunitinib 50 mg, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (dose reductions to 37·5 mg and 25 mg allowed); cabozantinib 60 mg daily (reductions to 40 mg and 20 mg allowed); crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (reductions to 200 mg twice daily and 250 mg once daily allowed); and savolitinib 600 mg daily (reductions to 400 mg and 200 mg allowed). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Analyses were done in an intention-to-treat population, with patients who did not receive protocol therapy excluded from safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761057. Between April 5, 2016, and Dec 15, 2019, 152 patients were randomly assigned to one of four study groups. Five patients were identified as ineligible post-randomisation and were excluded from these analyses, resulting in 147 eligible patients. Assignment to the savolitinib (29 patients) and crizotinib (28 patients) groups was halted after a prespecified futility analysis; planned accrual was completed for both sunitinib (46 patients) and cabozantinib (44 patients) groups. PFS was longer in patients in the cabozantinib group (median 9·0 months, 95% CI 6–12) than in the sunitinib group (5·6 months, 3–7; hazard ratio for progression or death 0·60, 0·37–0·97, one-sided p=0·019). Response rate for cabozantinib was 23% versus 4% for sunitinib (two-sided p=0·010). Savolitinib and crizotinib did not improve PFS compared with sunitinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 31 (69%) of 45 patients receiving sunitinib, 32 (74%) of 43 receiving cabozantinib, ten (37%) of 27 receiving crizotinib, and 11 (39%) of 28 receiving savolitinib; one grade 5 thromboembolic event was recorded in the cabozantinib group. Cabozantinib treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS compared with sunitinib in patients with metastatic PRCC. National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.

Baloxavir marboxil (hereafter baloxavir), a selective inhibitor of influenza cap-dependent endonuclease, was approved in 2018 in the USA and Japan for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza in otherwise healthy individuals aged 12 years and older. We aimed to study the efficacy of baloxavir in outpatients at high risk of developing influenza-associated complications. We did a double-blind, placebo-controlled and oseltamivir-controlled trial in outpatients aged 12 years and older in 551 sites in 17 countries and territories. Eligible patients had clinically diagnosed influenza-like illness, at least one risk factor for influenza-associated complications (eg, age older than 65 years), and a symptom duration of less than 48 h. Patients were stratified by baseline symptom score (≤14 vs ≥15), pre-existing and worsened symptoms at onset of illness compared with pre-influenza (yes or no), region (Asia, North America and Europe, or southern hemisphere), and weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg), and randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web-response system to either a single weight-based dose of baloxavir (40 mg for patients weighing <80 kg and 80 mg for patients weighing ≥80 kg; baloxavir group), oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days (oseltamivir group), or matching placebo (placebo group). All patients, investigators, study personnel, and data analysts were masked to treatment assignment until database lock. The primary endpoint was time to improvement of influenza symptoms (TTIIS) in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had RT-PCR-confirmed influenza virus infection. Safety was assessed in all patients who receved at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02949011. 2184 patients were enrolled from Jan 11, 2017, to March 30, 2018, and randomly assigned to receive baloxavir (n=730), placebo (n=729), or oseltamivir (n=725). The modified intention-to-treat population included 1163 patients: 388 in the baloxavir group, 386 in the placebo group, and 389 in the oseltamivir group. 557 (48%) of 1163 patients had influenza A H3N2, 484 (42%) had influenza B, 80 (7%) had influenza A H1N1, 14 patients had a mixed infection, and 28 had infections with non-typable viruses. The median TTIIS was shorter in the baloxavir group (73·2 h [95% CI 67·2 to 85·1]) than in the placebo group (102·3 h [92·7 to 113·1]; difference 29·1 h [95% CI 14·6 to 42·8]; p<0·0001). The median TTIIS in the oseltamivir group was 81·0 h (95% CI 69·4 to 91·5), with a difference from the baloxavir group of 7·7 h (−7·9 to 22·7). Adverse events were reported in 183 (25%) of 730 patients in the baloxavir group, 216 (30%) of 727 in the placebo group, and 202 (28%) of 721 in the oseltamivir group. Serious adverse events were noted in five patients in the baloxavir group, nine patients in the placebo group, and eight patients in the oseltamivir group; one case each of hypertension and nausea in the placebo group and two cases of transaminase elevation in the oseltamivir group were considered to be treatment related. Polymerase acidic protein variants with Ile38Thr, Ile38Met, or Ile38Asn substitutions conferring reduced baloxavir susceptibility emerged in 15 (5%) of 290 baloxavir recipients assessed for amino acid substitutions in the virus. Single-dose baloxavir has superior efficacy to placebo and similar efficacy to oseltamivir for ameliorating influenza symptoms in high-risk outpatients. The safety of baloxavir was comparable to placebo. This study supports early therapy for patients at high risk of complications of influenza to speed clinical recovery and reduce complications. Shionogi.

In phase 2 and 3 randomized, controlled trials, baloxavir — an inhibitor of influenza cap-dependent endonuclease — showed evidence of clinical symptom relief and antiviral activity against influenza. However, influenza-resistant variants appeared to develop with treatment.

In a randomized, double-blind trial that treated household contacts of patients with influenza with a single dose of baloxavir or placebo, participants taking baloxavir had a lower risk of influenza (1.9%) than placebo controls (13.6%). Adverse events were similar in the two groups.

Patients and clinicians share concerns that generic drug substitution might lead to loss of efficacy or emergence of adverse events. In this trial, we assessed US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioequivalence standards by studying the effects of switching between two disparate generic immediate-release lamotrigine products in patients with epilepsy. The Equivalence among Generic Antiepileptic Drugs (EQUIGEN) chronic-dose study was a randomised, double-blind, crossover study that enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with epilepsy from six epilepsy centres at academic institutions across the USA who were receiving immediate-release lamotrigine dosed at 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, or 400 mg twice daily. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two treatment sequences (sequence 1 or sequence 2), comprising four study periods of 14 days each. During each 14-day treatment period, patients received balanced doses of an oral generic lamotrigine product every 12 h (200–800 mg total, identical to lamotrigine dose prior to study enrolment); after each 14-day period, patients were crossed over to receive the other generic product. Computer-based randomisation was done using random permuted blocks of size two or four for each site to prevent sequence predictability. Both patients and study personnel were masked to the generic products selected, their predicted exposure (ie, “high” vs “low”), and their group allocation. The primary outcome of this trial was bioequivalence between the generic products, which was assessed at the end of the study through a comparison of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for each product in the analysis population (all patients who completed all four treatment periods). Bioequivalence was established if the 90% CIs of the ratios of these two parameters for the two products were within equivalence limits (80–125%) in the analysis population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov\\, number NCT01713777. Between April 25, 2013, and Aug 12, 2014, 35 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment sequence 1 (n=15) or treatment sequence 2 (n=20). 33 patients completed all four treatment periods and were included in the primary outcome analysis. The 90% CIs of the ratios of both Cmax and AUC were within equivalence limits (AUC 90% CI 98–103, Cmax 90% CI 99–105), showing that lamotrigine exposures were equivalent between the generic products. No significant changes in seizure frequency or adverse events were recorded. No deaths, study-related serious adverse events, or changes in clinical laboratory values or vital signs occurred during this study. Disparate generic lamotrigine products in patients with epilepsy showed bioequivalence with no detectable difference in clinical effects, confirming that US Food and Drug Administration bioequivalence standards are appropriate. American Epilepsy Society, Epilepsy Foundation, and US Food and Drug Administration.

In this randomized trial conducted over the 2019–2024 influenza seasons, baloxavir resulted in a significantly lower incidence of transmission of influenza virus from patients to household contacts than placebo.

Purpose Lamotrigine was previously reported to reduce serum concentration of quetiapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lamotrigine dose or quetiapine formulation was of importance for the drug interaction. Methods Patients combining lamotrigine with quetiapine (cases) were included retrospectively from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, as were a control group of patients using quetiapine without any interacting drugs. The case and control groups were divided into groups using immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) quetiapine. The case group was further split into high-dose (> 200 mg/day) and low-dose (≤ 200 mg/day) lamotrigine users. Quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (MPR) were compared between the control group and dose-separated case groups using ANOVA test and t -tests. Results In total, 406 patients were included. The mean C/D ratio of IR quetiapine was 46% lower in the high-dose lamotrigine group compared with the control group ( P  < 0.001), while no interaction effect was present in the low dose lamotrigine group ( P  = 0.7). Regardless of lamotrigine dose, there was no difference in quetiapine C/D ratio for patients using the XR formulation ( P  = 0.4). The quetiapine MPR was unaffected regardless of formulation and lamotrigine dose ( P  ≥ 0.06). Conclusion The effect of lamotrigine in reducing quetiapine concentration is only significant for patients using quetiapine IR tablets who are treated with lamotrigine doses > 200 mg/day. Because of high variability in the interaction effect, TDM of quetiapine should be recommended during co-prescription of high-dose lamotrigine.

Lamotrigine has been shown to be effective in the long-term treatment and relapse prevention of depression in bipolar disorder. However, the neuropsychological mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. We investigated the effects of lamotrigine on a battery of emotional processing tasks in healthy volunteers, previously shown to be sensitive to antidepressant drug action in similar experimental designs. Healthy volunteers (n = 36) were randomized in a double-blind design to receive a single dose of placebo or 300 mg lamotrigine. Mood and subjective effects were monitored throughout the study period, and emotional processing was assessed using the Oxford Emotional Test Battery (ETB) 3 hours post-administration. Participants receiving lamotrigine showed increased accurate recall of positive versus negative self-descriptors, compared to those in the placebo group. There were no other significant effects on emotional processing in the ETB, and lamotrigine did not affect ratings of mood or subjective experience. Lamotrigine did not induce widespread changes in emotional processing. However, there was increased positive bias in emotional memory, similar to the effects of antidepressants reported in previous studies. Further work is needed to assess whether similar effects are seen in the clinical treatment of patients with bipolar disorder and the extent to which this is associated with its clinical action in relapse prevention.

Background Seasonal influenza virus leads to more than half a million deaths each year worldwide. Due to its capacity to evolve, it is considered the most likely pathogen to cause a future pandemic. Antiviral treatment options are currently limited, with the most widely used drugs being neuraminidase inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir marboxil. In adult hospitalized patients, due to the lack of placebo-controlled trials, current available evidence on antiviral treatment benefits is essentially based on observational studies. A placebo-controlled clinical trial is needed to fill this knowledge gap. Methods This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority, multi-center trial to assess the clinical efficacy of single-dose baloxavir in decreasing time to clinical improvement in adult immunocompetent patients hospitalized with influenza. Patients ( n  = 484) with confirmed, severe infection (NEWS2 score ≥ 4) will be recruited over three influenza seasons in four large Swiss hospitals. Primary outcome: time to clinical improvement (in hours), calculated from treatment administration until NEWS2 score ≤ 2 maintained for 24 h or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first. The primary outcome is calculated in all patients independently of the duration of symptoms at treatment administration, as well as in participants treated early (<72 h) post onset of symptoms. The main secondary outcomes are the risk of serious influenza complications, length of hospitalization, and difference in viral load at D3 post-treatment administration. Discussion This trial’s results, whether positive or negative, will impact clinical guidance. If baloxavir’s clinical benefit is demonstrated, a single-dose pill would be the easiest implementable treatment option in case of large seasonal outbreaks or a new influenza pandemic. If a clear treatment benefit is not shown, antiviral treatment administration in the hospitalized patient population could be reconsidered to prevent unnecessary medication, lower the risk of resistance development linked to treatment overuse, and ultimately save unnecessary treatment-related expenses. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06653569. Registered on October 22, 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06653569?term=NCT06653569&rank=1 .

Residual symptoms and cognitive impairment are among important sources of disability in patients with bipolar disorder. Methylene blue could improve such symptoms because of its potential neuroprotective effects. We conducted a double-blind crossover study of a low dose (15 mg, 'placebo') and an active dose (195 mg) of methylene blue in patients with bipolar disorder treated with lamotrigine. Thirty-seven participants were enrolled in a 6-month trial (trial registration: NCT00214877). The outcome measures included severity of depression, mania and anxiety, and cognitive functioning. The active dose of methylene blue significantly improved symptoms of depression both on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (P = 0.02 and 0.05 in last-observation-carried-forward analysis). It also reduced the symptoms of anxiety measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (P = 0.02). The symptoms of mania remained low and stable throughout the study. The effects of methylene blue on cognitive symptoms were not significant. The medication was well tolerated with transient and mild side-effects. Methylene blue used as an adjunctive medication improved residual symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with bipolar disorder.