Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
9,375
result(s) for
"Venous thromboembolism"
Sort by:
Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer
by
Gussoni, Gualberto
,
Vescovo, Giorgio
,
Verso, Melina
in
Administration, Oral
,
Aged
,
Anticoagulants
2020
In a randomized trial, oral apixaban was noninferior to a low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin, in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism at 6 months in patients with cancer. The use of apixaban was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding than dalteparin, even in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Journal Article
Aspirin or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis after a Fracture
2023
In a trial in patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures or extremity fractures that were treated operatively, aspirin thromboprophylaxis was noninferior to low-molecular-weight heparin in preventing death at 90 days.
Journal Article
Apixaban for Extended Treatment of Provoked Venous Thromboembolism
by
Khairani, Candrika D.
,
Pandey, Arvind K.
,
Morrison, Ruth H.
in
Administration, Oral
,
Adult
,
Aged
2025
In patients with provoked venous thromboembolism and ongoing risk factors, extended treatment with low-dose apixaban for 12 months resulted in a lower risk of recurrent VTE than placebo, with a low risk of major bleeding.
Journal Article
Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism
2018
In a randomized trial, 1050 patients with cancer who had acute venous thromboembolism were assigned to receive either dalteparin or edoxaban for 6 to 12 months. Edoxaban was noninferior to dalteparin with respect to the outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding.
Journal Article
Intermediate-dose versus low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnant and post-partum women with a history of venous thromboembolism (Highlow study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
by
Chau, Cécile
,
Kleiverda, Gunilla
,
Lima, Suzanne
in
Anticoagulants
,
Anticoagulants - adverse effects
,
Bleeding
2022
Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and thromboprophylaxis is indicated in pregnant and post-partum women with a history of venous thromboembolism. The optimal dose of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the post-partum period is uncertain.
In this open-label, randomised, controlled trial (Highlow), pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism were recruited from 70 hospitals in nine countries (the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Canada, the USA, and Russia). Women were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older with a history of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism, and with a gestational age of 14 weeks or less. Eligible women were randomly assigned (1:1), before 14 weeks of gestational age, using a web-based system and permuted block randomisation (block size of six), stratified by centre, to either weight-adjusted intermediate-dose or fixed low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin subcutaneously once daily until 6 weeks post partum. The primary efficacy outcome was objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (ie, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or unusual site venous thrombosis), as determined by an independent central adjudication committee, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all women randomly assigned to treatment). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding which included antepartum, early post-partum (within 24 h after delivery), and late post-partum major bleeding (24 h or longer after delivery until 6 weeks post partum), assessed in all women who received at least one dose of assigned treatment and had a known end of treatment date. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01828697, and is now complete.
Between April 24, 2013, and Oct 31, 2020, 1339 pregnant women were screened for eligibility, of whom 1110 were randomly assigned to weight-adjusted intermediate-dose (n=555) or fixed low-dose (n=555) low-molecular-weight heparin (ITT population). Venous thromboembolism occurred in 11 (2%) of 555 women in the weight-adjusted intermediate-dose group and in 16 (3%) of 555 in the fixed low-dose group (relative risk [RR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·32–1·47]; p=0·33). Venous thromboembolism occurred antepartum in five (1%) women in the intermediate-dose group and in five (1%) women in the low-dose group, and post partum in six (1%) women and 11 (2%) women. On-treatment major bleeding in the safety population (N=1045) occurred in 23 (4%) of 520 women in the intermediate-dose group and in 20 (4%) of 525 in the low-dose group (RR 1·16 [95% CI 0·65–2·09]).
In women with a history of venous thromboembolism, weight-adjusted intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin during the combined antepartum and post-partum periods was not associated with a lower risk of recurrence than fixed low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin. These results indicate that low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy is the appropriate dose for the prevention of pregnancy-related recurrent venous thromboembolism.
French Ministry of Health, Health Research Board Ireland, GSK/Aspen, and Pfizer.
Journal Article
Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization for Medical Illness
2018
Patients discharged from the hospital carry an increased risk of venous thromboembolism after discharge. A randomized trial of rivaroxaban for 6 weeks after hospital discharge had no significant effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism as compared with placebo.
Journal Article
Atorvastatin versus placebo in patients with covid-19 in intensive care: randomized controlled trial
2022
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the effect of statin treatment versus placebo on clinical outcomes in patients with covid-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).DesignINSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 2×2 factorial design. Results for the anticoagulation randomization have been reported previously. Results for the double blind randomization to atorvastatin versus placebo are reported here.Setting11 hospitals in Iran.ParticipantsAdults aged ≥18 years with covid-19 admitted to the ICU.InterventionAtorvastatin 20 mg orally once daily versus placebo, to be continued for 30 days from randomization irrespective of hospital discharge status.Main outcome measuresThe primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality within 30 days from randomization. Prespecified safety outcomes included increase in liver enzyme levels more than three times the upper limit of normal and clinically diagnosed myopathy. A clinical events committee blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated the efficacy and safety outcomes.ResultsOf 605 patients randomized between 29 July 2020 and 4 April 2021 for statin randomization in the INSPIRATION-S trial, 343 were co-randomized to intermediate dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin based regimens, whereas 262 were randomized after completion of the anticoagulation study. 587 of the 605 participants were included in the primary analysis of INSPIRATION-S, reported here: 290 were assigned to atorvastatin and 297 to placebo (median age 57 years (interquartile range 45-68 years); 256 (44%) women). The primary outcome occurred in 95 (33%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 108 (36%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.21). Death occurred in 90 (31%) patients in the atorvastatin group and 103 (35%) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.22). Rates for venous thromboembolism were 2% (n=6) in the atorvastatin group and 3% (n=9) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 2.06). Myopathy was not clinically diagnosed in either group. Liver enzyme levels were increased in five (2%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and six (2%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 2.81).ConclusionsIn adults with covid-19 admitted to the ICU, atorvastatin was not associated with a significant reduction in the composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality compared with placebo. Treatment was, however, found to be safe. As the overall event rates were lower than expected, a clinically important treatment effect cannot be excluded.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04486508.
Journal Article
Apixaban to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer
by
Carrier, Marc
,
Le Gal, Gregoire
,
Trinkaus, Mateya
in
Administration, Oral
,
Aged
,
Anticoagulants
2019
Patients receiving cancer treatment who had an intermediate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolism were randomly assigned to apixaban or placebo for 6 months. VTE was noted in 4.2% of patients receiving apixaban and 10.2% of those receiving placebo, a significant difference. Major bleeding occurred in 3.5% of patients with apixaban and in 1.8% with placebo.
Journal Article
Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer
2019
A placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy of rivaroxaban to prevent venous thrombosis in patients with cancer at high risk for thrombosis. The thrombosis rate was lower with rivaroxaban, but for the 180-day assessment period, the difference was not significant. Bleeding was approximately twice as common in the rivaroxaban group.
Journal Article