Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and importanceOn the basis of resolution 189/2018 published by our city health council, the hospital pharmacy service was entrusted with the centralisation of the procedure for the acquisition, compounding, distribution and dispensing of methadone to drug addicts in integral attention centres. In order to improve and increase the beyond use date (BUD) of methadone oral solutions, we carried out a physicochemical stability study.Aim and objectivesTo develop an analytical method and validation to carry out a physicochemical stability study of two oral solutions of methadone to increase their BUD. Method development should be made in an effective and reproducible manner.Material and methodsThe study was carried out on two formulations of methadone 10 mg/mL, which were prepared with and without parabens as preservatives. A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Agilent 1100 was used, provided with a quaternary pump and an ultraviolet diode array detector to determine methadone. First we carried out the analytical method development to achieve the analytical performance characteristics. Then we performed validation of the analytical method obtaining linearity, instrumental intra-assay and inter-assay precision, and accuracy and recovery percentage.ResultsChromatographic conditions were: flow rate 1.6 mL/min, 55% acetonitrile and 45% phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH=10) as the mobile phase. Injection volume was 50 µL, the temperature in the column compartment was 40°C. The column used was the Xterra C18 because methadone pKa is 8.3. Retention time for methadone was 4.5 min and for parabens 1.5 min.The final methadone determination method was validated for a standard of 10 mg/mL and applied for the determination of methadone with two parabens. The most relevant results were: correlation coefficient r=0.9957 for methadone in the range tested (7.5–12.5 mg/mL); instrumental precision 0.33% for standards (n=10); intra-assay precision 0.53% (n=6) and inter-assay precision 1.95% (n=12). The relative standard deviation percentage for accuracy was 1.28%, and the percentage recovery was 101.5 ±1.5%.Conclusion and relevanceAnalytical method development and validation procedures are vital in the discovery and development of drugs and pharmaceuticals to ensure performance of the method. The proposed HPLC conditions to determine methadone were proved to be valid and reproducible for carrying out physicochemical stability studies of different methadone oral solutions.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.

Purpose Refractory cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) affects a patient’s functional capacity and quality of life, but there is limited evidence to guide opioid choice. We assessed the feasibility, tolerability and possible efficacy of methadone rotation (MR) compared to other opioid rotations (OOR) in this cohort. Methods Adults with CIBP and worst pain intensity ≥ 4/10 and/or opioid toxicity graded ≥ 2 on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were randomised 1:1 to methadone or another opioid rotation. Standardised assessment tools were used at pre-defined study time points up to 14 days. Results Of 51 eligible participants, 38 (74.5%) consented, and 29 (76.3%, MR: 14, OOR: 15) completed the fourteen days follow-up post-opioid rotation. Both groups displayed significant reduction in average (MR: d  =  − 1.2, p  = 0.003, OOR: d  =  − 0.8, p  = 0.015) and worst pain (MR: d  =  − 0.9, p  = 0.042, OOR: d  =  − 0.6, p  = 0.048) and total pain interference score (MR: d  =  − 1.1, p  = 0.042, OOR: d  =  − 0.7, p  = 0.007). Oral morphine equivalent daily dose was reduced significantly in MR compared to the OOR group ( d  =  − 0.8, p  = 0.05). The incidence of opioid-related adverse events following MR was unchanged but lower in the OOR group ( d  = 0.9, 95% CI 0.1,1.7, p  = 0.022). There were no within-group or between-group differences in satisfaction with analgesia at the end of the study. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated that MR and OOR in patients with refractory CIBP are feasible, safe and acceptable to patients. Appropriately powered multi-centre randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of MR and OOR in this cohort. Trial registration ACTRN12621000141842 registered 11 February 2021.

In this 12-month randomized trial involving 251 long-term heroin users, injectable diacetylmorphine (the active ingredient in heroin) was more effective than oral methadone in achieving retention in treatment for addiction and in reducing illicit-drug use and other illegal activity. As compared with methadone, injectable diacetylmorphine was associated with more serious adverse events, including seizures and drug overdoses. In long-term heroin users, injectable diacetylmorphine (the active ingredient in heroin) was more effective than oral methadone in achieving retention in treatment for addiction and in reducing illicit-drug use and other illegal activity. Opioid dependence, most commonly manifested as heroin dependence, is a chronic relapsing condition 1 that is estimated to affect more than 1 million persons in North America. 2 , 3 The risks of opioid dependence include fatal overdoses, infections (including endocarditis, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and hepatitis C virus infection), social disintegration, violence, and crime. The associated burdens on communities include medical, public health, and criminal-justice costs as well as public disorder and crimes against property. Methadone, the standard opioid-substitution treatment, has been shown to reduce major risks associated with untreated opioid dependence in patients who are willing to undergo and are successfully . . .

Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT’s use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics’ take-home dosing policies have affected patients’ experiences of treatment and lives in general. Methods This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples’ substance use treatment needs and goals. Results Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Conclusions Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy.

Background Hip fractures are a source of severe pain among the elderly population and pose challenges due to limited analgesic tolerance. Perioperative methadone has shown promise in our pilot study suggesting a safe dose of 0.10 mg/kg, prompting further investigation into its benefits for elderly hip fracture patients. Methods This study employs a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the analgesic effects of a single dose of methadone during hip fracture surgery. Patients aged ≥ 60 years are consecutively enrolled and randomized to receive either perioperative methadone (treatment group) or a saline solution (placebo group). A sample size of 130 patients is required for 88% statistical power. The medication is administered intravenously at anesthesia induction and monitored until discharge. A follow-up observation is conducted 3 months post-surgery. Discussion Primary outcome: Daily consumption of opioids within the first 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain, mobility, nausea, vomiting, time to discharge, need for antidote, delirium, and constipation. The 3-month follow-up includes opioid use, pain, EQ-5D-5L scores, mobility, and persistent side effects. If statistically significant advantages are found in the treatment group, perioperative methadone could be considered as standard care for hip fracture patients, potentially enhancing their pain management. The study’s outcomes will provide insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating methadone into routine clinical practices for this patient group. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06086171, submitted 4. October 2023. EU-CT: 2023–506252-24–00, UTN: U1111-1294–6125.

Methadone is an effective treatment for opioid dependence. When people who are receiving methadone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence are incarcerated in prison or jail, most US correctional facilities discontinue their methadone treatment, either gradually, or more often, abruptly. This discontinuation can cause uncomfortable symptoms of withdrawal and renders prisoners susceptible to relapse and overdose on release. We aimed to study the effect of forced withdrawal from methadone upon incarceration on individuals' risk behaviours and engagement with post-release treatment programmes. In this randomised, open-label trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) inmates of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RI, USA) who were enrolled in a methadone maintenance-treatment programme in the community at the time of arrest and wanted to remain on methadone treatment during incarceration and on release, to either continuation of their methadone treatment or to usual care—forced tapered withdrawal from methadone. Participants could be included in the study only if their incarceration would be more than 1 week but less than 6 months. We did the random assignments with a computer-generated random permutation, and urn randomisation procedures to stratify participants by sex and race. Participants in the continued-methadone group were maintained on their methadone dose at the time of their incarceration (with dose adjustments as clinically indicated). Patients in the forced-withdrawal group followed the institution's standard withdrawal protocol of receiving methadone for 1 week at the dose at the time of their incarceration, then a tapered withdrawal regimen (for those on a starting dose >100 mg, the dose was reduced by 5 mg per day to 100 mg, then reduced by 3 mg per day to 0 mg; for those on a starting dose >100 mg, the dose was reduced by 3 mg per day to 0 mg). The main outcomes were engagement with a methadone maintenance-treatment clinic after release from incarceration and time to engagement with methadone maintenance treatment, by intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses, which we established in a follow-up interview with the participants at 1 month after their release from incarceration. Our study paid for 10 weeks of methadone treatment after release if participants needed financial help. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01874964. Between June 14, 2011, and April 3, 2013, we randomly assigned 283 prisoners to our study, 142 to continued methadone treatment, and 141 to forced withdrawal from methadone. Of these, 60 were excluded because they did not fit the eligibility criteria, leaving 114 in the continued-methadone group and 109 in the forced-withdrawal group (usual care). Participants assigned to continued methadone were more than twice as likely than forced-withdrawal participants to return to a community methadone clinic within 1 month of release (106 [96%] of 110 in the continued-methadone group compared with 68 [78%] of 87 in the forced-withdrawal group; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2·04, 95% CI 1·48–2·80). We noted no differences in serious adverse events between groups. For the continued-methadone and forced-withdrawal groups, the number of deaths were one and zero, non-fatal overdoses were one and two, admissions to hospital were one and four; and emergency-room visits were 11 and 16, respectively. Although our study had several limitations—eg, it only included participants incarcerated for fewer than 6 months, we showed that forced withdrawal from methadone on incarceration reduced the likelihood of prisoners re-engaging in methadone maintenance after their release. Continuation of methadone maintenance during incarceration could contribute to greater treatment engagement after release, which could in turn reduce the risk of death from overdose and risk behaviours. National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research from the National Institutes of Health.

In this trial comparing methadone with buprenorphine in opioid-dependent pregnant women, neonates exposed to buprenorphine required less morphine to treat neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and had a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization and of treatment for NAS. Opioid dependence during pregnancy is compounded by multiple risk factors contributing to adverse maternal, neonatal, and long-term developmental consequences. 1 – 6 Improved treatment options should reduce the public health and medical costs associated with the treatment of neonates exposed to opioids, which in 2009 was estimated at $70.6 million to $112.6 million in the United States alone. 7 Just as the use of methadone in nonpregnant patients with opioid dependence improves patient outcomes, 8 its use as part of a comprehensive approach to the care of pregnant women improves maternal and neonatal outcomes, as compared with no treatment and with medication-assisted withdrawal. 4 , . . .

Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 ( KCNH2 ) polymorphisms have been found to influence the heart-rate adjusted QT (QTc) intervals. We investigated the association between KCNH2 polymorphisms and QTc intervals among Malay opioid-dependent methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) recipients. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 111 patients with stable methadone dosage for at least 6 months attending several methadone clinics in Kelantan, Malaysia between March 2011 and October 2012. Those with cardiac structural defects, recipients of other QTc-prolonging pharmacotherapeutic agents, had aggressive behavior or other active psychiatric illnesses, chronic medical and surgical ailments and who were unable to communicate in Malay and English were excluded. The Fridericia-corrected QTc intervals were recorded using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. DNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and genotyped using nested allele-specific polymerase chain reaction for these four KCNH2 polymorphisms: 1539C > T, 1956T > C, 2350C > T, and 2690A > C. Mean QTc interval is 408 ms (SD: 24). Molecular docking was performed on all four KCNH2 polymorphisms to investigate the impact of the nucleotide changes on methadone binding. Based on multiple regression analysis, only 1539T > C polymorphism (β adjusted : 10.506 (95% CI:0.846, 20.166), p = 0.033; recessive model), serum methadone trough (β adjusted : 0.025 (95% CI: 0.006, 0.043), p = 0.009), potassium (β adjusted : -8.756 (95% CI: -15.938, -1.575), p = 0.017) and magnesium (β adjusted : -106.226 (95% CI: -159.291, -53.161), p < 0.001) levels were significantly associated with mean QTc. Molecular docking analysis resulted in good binding-energy values between the 1539C > T and methadone, with the formation of hydrophobic and π–π stacking interactions, suggesting that 1539C > T was the newly discovered SNP involved in QTc prolongation. In conclusion, the 1539C > T KCNH2 polymorphism is associated with QTc prolongation in our MMT recipients, necessitating QTc monitoring to prevent methadone-associated cardiotoxicity in this Malay MMT population.

Objective To compare the risk for all cause and overdose mortality in people with opioid dependence during and after substitution treatment with methadone or buprenorphine and to characterise trends in risk of mortality after initiation and cessation of treatment.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and LILACS to September 2016.Study selection Prospective or retrospective cohort studies in people with opioid dependence that reported deaths from all causes or overdose during follow-up periods in and out of opioid substitution treatment with methadone or buprenorphine.Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed study quality. Mortality rates in and out of treatment were jointly combined across methadone or buprenorphine cohorts by using multivariate random effects meta-analysis.Results There were 19 eligible cohorts, following 122 885 people treated with methadone over 1.3-13.9 years and 15 831 people treated with buprenorphine over 1.1-4.5 years. Pooled all cause mortality rates were 11.3 and 36.1 per 1000 person years in and out of methadone treatment (unadjusted out-to-in rate ratio 3.20, 95% confidence interval 2.65 to 3.86) and reduced to 4.3 and 9.5 in and out of buprenorphine treatment (2.20, 1.34 to 3.61). In pooled trend analysis, all cause mortality dropped sharply over the first four weeks of methadone treatment and decreased gradually two weeks after leaving treatment. All cause mortality remained stable during induction and remaining time on buprenorphine treatment. Overdose mortality evolved similarly, with pooled overdose mortality rates of 2.6 and 12.7 per 1000 person years in and out of methadone treatment (unadjusted out-to-in rate ratio 4.80, 2.90 to 7.96) and 1.4 and 4.6 in and out of buprenorphine treatment.Conclusions Retention in methadone and buprenorphine treatment is associated with substantial reductions in the risk for all cause and overdose mortality in people dependent on opioids. The induction phase onto methadone treatment and the time immediately after leaving treatment with both drugs are periods of particularly increased mortality risk, which should be dealt with by both public health and clinical strategies to mitigate such risk. These findings are potentially important, but further research must be conducted to properly account for potential confounding and selection bias in comparisons of mortality risk between opioid substitution treatments, as well as throughout periods in and out of each treatment.

Postoperative pain is significant in cardiac surgical patients. Perioperative analgesia with intermittent administration of opioids can result in significant fluctuations in serum opioid concentrations. Methadone should provide a rapid onset and long-term pain relief upon a single intravenous dose at induction of anesthesia, and may reduce chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in cardiac surgical patients. The feasibility of using intravenous methadone in Chinese cardiac surgical patients, and its effect on acute and chronic pain management after cardiac surgery will be evaluated. A single-center, prospective, randomized-controlled pilot trial. Adult cardiac surgical patients will be randomized to receive 0.2 mg/kg methadone or morphine at induction of anesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia morphine protocol, oral paracetamol and dihydrocodeine will be given for postoperative analgesia. Venous blood sampling for plasma methadone concentration will be obtained at regular intervals from study drug infusion to 96 hours after administration. The primary outcome will be a description of study feasibility, encompassing recruitment and retention, protocol adherence and stakeholder acceptability. Secondary outcomes include the time of ventilator weaning to spontaneous breathing, time of extubation, morphine requirements within 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery, time to first morphine rescue, postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and length of stay in ICU and hospital. Opioid-related side effects including sedation, nausea and vomiting, and time to first bowel opening will be recorded. CPSP will be assessed with Neuropathic Pain Scale and Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Randomized controlled trials on intravenous methadone in cardiac surgical patients are scarce, with none in Chinese populations. This study, supported by plasma methadone concentration analysis, will establish a basis for future large-scale research aimed at improving recovery through optimized pain management. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05913284.