Paper

AvianLexiconAtlas: A database of descriptive categories of English-language bird names around the world

Mota, Talia M, Mclaughlin, J F, Yan, Sissy, Gulson-Castillo, Eric R, Nwigwe, Ugo, Hack, Matthew, Archard, Olivia, Chavoshan, Ida, Shultz, Allison J, Soto-Patino, Juliana, Ali, Jarome R, Morrison, Erin S, Baquero, Illeana, Pandolfi, Guinevere P, Noguchi, Lara, Young Ha Suh, Zhao, Ziqi, Bennett, Kevin Fp, Hudon, Jocelyn, Wang, Qingyue, Aguillon, Stepfanie M, Leighton, Gavin M, Gaia Rueda Moreno, Long, Kira M, Zalinski, Betsy, Skeen, Heather R, Baldassarre, Daniel T, Simard, Jared A, Davis, Sarah N, Goodman, Brooke D, Riley, Bryant, Rasband, Shauna Ann, Silvernail, Lauren C, Bonney, Kevin M, Mccoy, Dakota E, Warshauer, Matthew E, Catanach, Rosanne M, Catanach, Therese A, Provost, Kaiya, Ma, Ziqi, Pegan, Teresa, Salter, Jessie F

2024,2025

Overview

Common names of species are important for communicating with the general public. In principle, these names should provide an accessible way to engage with and identify species. The common names of species have historically been labile without standard guidelines, even within a language. Currently, there is no systematic assessment of how often common names communicate identifiable and biologically relevant characteristics about species. This is a particular issue in ornithology, where common names are used more often than scientific names for species of birds in written and spoken English, even by professional researchers. To gain a better understanding of the types of terminology used in the common names of bird species and their frequency of use, we used a crowdsourcing approach and recruited 85 professional ornithologists and non-professional participants to classify unique descriptors in the English-language common names of all recognized bird species from around the world. Each species' common name was assigned to one of ten categories associated with aspects of avian biology, ecology, or human culture. Across 10,906 species of birds, 89% have names describing the biology of the species, while the remaining 11% of species have names derived from human cultural references or local non-English languages. Species with common names based on features of avian biology are more likely to be related to each other or be from the same geographic region. The crowdsourced data collection also revealed that many common names contained specialized or historic terminology unknown to many of the data collectors, and this was documented in a glossary and gazetteer alongside the dataset. As the first comprehensive assessment of the state of terminology in English-language common names of birds, the AvianLexiconAtlas database sheds light on historical approaches to nomenclature and provides insight into how the general public currently engages with species through their names.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Footnotes* The title, abstract, introduction, and conclusion have been updated to present the new dataset, glossary, and gazetteer produced during this research as a research database, now called the AvianLexiconAtlas. Researchers from across academic fields can use the resources in this database to study the history of English-language bird names from a quantitative perspective. In the text we clarify the utility of this database as a resource, but have not changed any of the methods, analyses, figures, or supplemental files.* https://github.com/ajshultz/AvianLexiconAtlas

• Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
• Subject: Biology / Birds / Crowdsourcing / Data collection / English language / Language / Nomenclature / Species / Terminology / Vernacular names / Zoology