Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study
by
Scott Ryan Schroeder
, Falck, Suzanne
, Mirea, Nicole
, Schiff, Gordon D
, Gaunt, Michael J
, Lambert, Bruce L
, Michelle Bryson Opfermann
, Christine Rash Foanio
, Vaida, Allen J
, Galanter, William L
in
Auditory perception
/ Drug stores
/ Headphones
/ Hypotheses
/ Laboratories
/ Medical errors
/ Memory
/ Names
/ Patient safety
/ Regression analysis
/ Technicians
/ Visual perception
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study
by
Scott Ryan Schroeder
, Falck, Suzanne
, Mirea, Nicole
, Schiff, Gordon D
, Gaunt, Michael J
, Lambert, Bruce L
, Michelle Bryson Opfermann
, Christine Rash Foanio
, Vaida, Allen J
, Galanter, William L
in
Auditory perception
/ Drug stores
/ Headphones
/ Hypotheses
/ Laboratories
/ Medical errors
/ Memory
/ Names
/ Patient safety
/ Regression analysis
/ Technicians
/ Visual perception
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study
by
Scott Ryan Schroeder
, Falck, Suzanne
, Mirea, Nicole
, Schiff, Gordon D
, Gaunt, Michael J
, Lambert, Bruce L
, Michelle Bryson Opfermann
, Christine Rash Foanio
, Vaida, Allen J
, Galanter, William L
in
Auditory perception
/ Drug stores
/ Headphones
/ Hypotheses
/ Laboratories
/ Medical errors
/ Memory
/ Names
/ Patient safety
/ Regression analysis
/ Technicians
/ Visual perception
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study
Journal Article
Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundWrong-drug medication errors are common. Regulators screen drug names for confusability, but screening methods lack empirical validation. Previous work showed that psycholinguistic tests on pairs of drug names are associated with real-world error rates in chain pharmacies. However, regulators evaluate individual names not pairs, and individual names can be confused with multiple drugs (eg, hydroxyzine with hydralazine but also hydrocet, thorazine, hydrochlorothiazide). This study examines whether an individual drug name’s performance on psycholinguistic tests correlates with that name’s sum total error rate in the real world.MethodsNineteen pharmacists and 18 pharmacy technicians completed memory and perception tests assessing confusability of 77 drug names. Tests involved presenting a drug name to participants in conditions that hindered their ability to see, hear or remember the name. Participants typed the name they perceived and selected that name from a menu of alternatives. Error rates on the tests were assessed in relation to real-world rates, as reported by the patient safety organisation associated with a national pharmacy chain in the USA.ResultsMean error rate on the psycholinguistic tests was positively correlated with the log-adjusted real-world error rate (r=0.50, p<0.0001). Linear and mixed effects logistic regression analyses indicated that the lab-measured error rates significantly predicted the real-world error rates and vice versa.ConclusionsLab-based psycholinguistic tests are associated with real-world drug name confusion error rates. Previous work showed that such tests were associated with error rates of specific look-alike sound-alike pairs, and the current work showed that lab-based error rates are also associated with an individual drug’s overall error rate. Taken together, these studies validate the use of psycholinguistic tests in assessing the confusability of proposed drug names.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.