Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sulcus Using the Somatosensory Evoked Potential Phase Reversal Technique
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sulcus Using the Somatosensory Evoked Potential Phase Reversal Technique
Do you wish to request the book?
Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sulcus Using the Somatosensory Evoked Potential Phase Reversal Technique
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Factors Affecting Successful Localization of the Central Sulcus Using the Somatosensory Evoked Potential Phase Reversal Technique
2013
Overview
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Perirolandic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological deficit that can be reduced by accurate recognition of the location of sensorimotor cortex. The median somatosensory evoked potential (MSSEP) phase reversal technique (PRT) reliably identifies the central sulcus (CS) intraoperatively, but does require additional surgical time. Awareness of factors that lengthen the time required for MSSEP PRT has important implications for surgical planning.
OBJECTIVE:
To identify factors that affect the time required for CS localization via MSSEP PRT.
METHODS:
Multivariate Cox regression analysis, applied in 100 consecutive cases of perirolandic surgery at a single institution from 2005 to 2010, during which CS localization was attempted via a standardized MSSEP PRT.
RESULTS:
The CS was reliably identified in 77 cases. The mean time to identification was 5 minutes (SD = 5; range, 1–20 minutes). Lesion location either very close to the CS (within the postcentral gyrus) or at an intermediate distance (with edema extending very close to the CS) independently decreased the rate at which the CS was identified by 73% (hazard ratio: 0.27, P < .001) and 55% (hazard ratio: 0.45, P = .007), respectively. Highly destructive pathology reduced this rate by 42% (hazard ratio: 0.58, P = .03), after adjusting for other important factors. Epidural recording, age, and the presence of a burst suppression pattern on the electroencephalogram had no effect.
CONCLUSION:
MSSEP PRT is an effective method for CS identification and only marginally lengthens the operative time. However, difficulty in CS localization can be expected in the presence of postcentral gyrus lesions, edema distorting perirolandic anatomy, and with highly destructive pathology.
Publisher
Oxford University Press,Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
Subject
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Brain Diseases - epidemiology
/ Child
/ Edema
/ Electroencephalography - methods
/ Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
/ Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
