Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
by
White, Gemma
, Martin, Lee
, Savage, Martin O
, Willemsen, Ruben
, Andrews, Afiya
, Cosier, Shakira
, Storr, Helen L
in
Age
/ Celiac disease
/ Children & youth
/ Crohn's disease
/ Endocrinology
/ Growth
/ Growth hormones
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical records
/ Medical referrals
/ Pathology
/ Pediatrics
/ Surveillance
/ Teenagers
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
by
White, Gemma
, Martin, Lee
, Savage, Martin O
, Willemsen, Ruben
, Andrews, Afiya
, Cosier, Shakira
, Storr, Helen L
in
Age
/ Celiac disease
/ Children & youth
/ Crohn's disease
/ Endocrinology
/ Growth
/ Growth hormones
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical records
/ Medical referrals
/ Pathology
/ Pediatrics
/ Surveillance
/ Teenagers
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
by
White, Gemma
, Martin, Lee
, Savage, Martin O
, Willemsen, Ruben
, Andrews, Afiya
, Cosier, Shakira
, Storr, Helen L
in
Age
/ Celiac disease
/ Children & youth
/ Crohn's disease
/ Endocrinology
/ Growth
/ Growth hormones
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical records
/ Medical referrals
/ Pathology
/ Pediatrics
/ Surveillance
/ Teenagers
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
Journal Article
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveThe aim of this observational study was to evaluate the UK and Dutch referral criteria for short stature to determine their sensitivity and specificity in predicting pathological short stature. Adherence to the recommended panel of investigations was also assessed.Study designRetrospective review of medical records to examine the auxological parameters, investigations and diagnosis of subjects referred to two paediatric endocrine clinics at the Royal London Children’s Hospital between 2016 and 2021. We analysed: height SD score (HtSDS), height SDS minus target height SDS (Ht-THSDS) and height deflection SDS (HtDefSDS). The UK referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.7, Ht-THSDS >2.0 and HtDefSDS >1.3. The Dutch referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.0, Ht-THSDS >1.6 and HtDefSDS >1.0.ResultsData were available for 143 subjects (72% males) with mean (range) age 8.7 years (0.5–19.9). HtSDS and Ht-THSDS were significantly lower in the pathological stature (n=66) versus the non-pathological stature (n=77) subjects (−2.67±0.82 vs −1.97±0.70; p<0.001 and −2.07±1.02 vs −1.06±0.99; p<0.001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity to detect pathology was 41% and 83% for the UK criteria (HtSDS <−2.7) compared with 59% and 79% for the Dutch criteria (HtSDS <−2.0), 48% and 83% for UK criteria (Ht-THSDS <−2.0) compared with 74% and 72% for Dutch criteria (Ht-THSDS <−1.6) and 33% and 68% for UK criteria (HtDefSDS >1.3) compared with 44% and 63% for the Dutch criteria (HtDefSDS >1.0). On average, each patient had 88% of the recommended investigations, and 53% had all the recommended testing. New pathology was identified in 36% of subjects.ConclusionsIn isolation, the UK auxological referral thresholds have limited sensitivity and specificity for pathological short stature. The combination of HtSDS and Ht-THSDS improved the sensitivity of UK criteria to detect pathology from 41% to 68%. Attention to the child’s genetic height potential prior to referral can prevent unnecessary assessments.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.