Journal Article

Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation in community-based electronic health records: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Wu, Jianhua, Nadarajah, Ramesh, Alsaeed, Eman, Aktaa, Suleman, Gale, Chris P, Cowan, Campbel, Hurdus, Ben, Hogg, David, Bates, Matthew G D

2022

Overview

ObjectiveAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common and is associated with an increased risk of stroke. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse multivariable prediction models derived and/or validated in electronic health records (EHRs) and/or administrative claims databases for the prediction of incident AF in the community.MethodsOvid Medline and Ovid Embase were searched for records from inception to 23 March 2021. Measures of discrimination were extracted and pooled by Bayesian meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed through a 95% prediction interval (PI). Risk of bias was assessed using Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool and certainty in effect estimates by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.ResultsEleven studies met inclusion criteria, describing nine prediction models, with four eligible for meta-analysis including 9 289 959 patients. The CHADS (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age>75, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack) (summary c-statistic 0.674; 95% CI 0.610 to 0.732; 95% PI 0.526–0.815), CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age>75 (2 points), Stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism (2 points), Vascular disease, Age 65–74, Sex category) (summary c-statistic 0.679; 95% CI 0.620 to 0.736; 95% PI 0.531–0.811) and HATCH (Hypertension, Age, stroke or Transient ischemic attack, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Heart failure) (summary c-statistic 0.669; 95% CI 0.600 to 0.732; 95% PI 0.513–0.803) models resulted in a c-statistic with a statistically significant 95% PI and moderate discriminative performance. No model met eligibility for inclusion in meta-analysis if studies at high risk of bias were excluded and certainty of effect estimates was ‘low’. Models derived by machine learning demonstrated strong discriminative performance, but lacked rigorous external validation.ConclusionsModels externally validated for prediction of incident AF in community-based EHR demonstrate moderate predictive ability and high risk of bias. Novel methods may provide stronger discriminative performance.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021245093.

• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: Aged / Arrhythmias and Sudden Death / atrial fibrillation / Atrial Fibrillation - complications / Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis / Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology / Bayes Theorem / Bias / Cardiac arrhythmia / Electronic Health Records / Heart failure / Heart Failure - complications / Humans / Hypertension / Hypertension - complications / Ischemic Attack, Transient - complications / Meta-analysis / primary care / Risk Assessment - methods / Risk Factors / Stroke / Stroke - complications / Stroke - etiology / Systematic review / Transient ischemic attack