Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner’s perspective: a qualitative study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner’s perspective: a qualitative study
Do you wish to request the book?
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner’s perspective: a qualitative study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner’s perspective: a qualitative study
2025
Overview
ObjectivesTo explore healthcare professionals’ perspectives and practices regarding informed consent during childbirth, particularly in the context of increased public awareness and discourse surrounding obstetric violence (OV) in France.DesignA qualitative study based on semistructured interviews and non-participant observations.SettingFour maternity units in France, representing a diversity of institutional contexts.ParticipantsA purposive sample of 32 participants, including midwives and obstetricians, was recruited across the four sites.MethodsData were collected through 32 semistructured interviews and in situ observations in labour and delivery rooms. A thematic analysis was conducted using a phenomenological approach, supported by NVivo software.ResultsFour main themes emerged: (1) relational malaise in the caregiver–patient relationship, reinforced by public discourse on OV, further hindered shared decision-making and open communication. (2) Challenges between caring values and systemic constraints (eg, lack of time, staffing shortages and protocol-driven care) limited professionals’ ability to engage in meaningful informed consent discussions. (3) Safety paradigm in obstetrics: fetal well-being emerged as a central and non-negotiable argument to justify medical interventions during childbirth. (4) Informed consent as a source of tension, where professionals struggled to balance legal and ethical obligations with clinical urgency, often leading to coercive or merely formal consent processes.ConclusionsInformed consent during childbirth remains a critical and unresolved ethical challenge. This study highlights systemic, relational and emotional barriers that hinder shared decision-making and compromise the core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and justice. Addressing these issues requires structural changes, improved working conditions to support individualised care, better training in ethics and communication and greater recognition of the moral distress experienced by healthcare professionals.Registration numberRegistration number 22-219 from CEEI-IRB INSERM (Research Institutional Review Board INSERM, France) (IRB 00003888, IORG 0003254, FWA 00005831).
Publisher
British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
