MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI
Journal Article

Anatomical severity of Ebstein’s anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundEbstein’s anomaly (EA) exhibits significant anatomical and clinical heterogeneity, warranting a systematic approach to risk stratification. While the Carpentier classification (CC) is commonly employed for qualitative disease assessment, there is increasing interest in quantitative imaging parameters to personalise monitoring strategies and therapeutic interventions. We sought to evaluate the association between cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters, CC and symptoms of heart failure (HF). Also, we investigated whether CMR-derived markers may predict the need for bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis (BCPA) and the occurrence of haemodynamic complications or significant right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in the postoperative stay.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients diagnosed with EA undergoing 1.5T CMR acquisition at a tertiary care centre. CC and quantitative indices were extracted from steady-state free precession sequences.ResultsIn a total population of 60 patients (53% male, median age 22 years), CMR parameters most strongly associated (p<0.001) with CC included indexed displacement of the septal (SLDi) and inferior (ILDi) leaflets, Ebstein valve rotation angle, functional RV ejection fraction, indexed atrialised RV end-diastolic volume and the ratio of either atrialised or functional RV to anatomical RV. Decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97, p=0.01) and increasing ILDi (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.10, p=0.04) emerged as the most prominent variables associated with HF symptoms. Additionally, ILDi was significantly linked to the need for BCPA (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.28), the occurrence of haemodynamic complications (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18) and significant RV dysfunction in the postoperative stay (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.17).ConclusionsQuantitative CMR indices proved to be effective in distinguishing between Carpentier classes and they may be valuable in an integrated CMR-based approach to assess EA severity. Among these, ILDi reflects both the extent of tricuspid valve abnormality and RV atrialisation and may serve as a useful metric in guiding personalised therapeutic strategies.