Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Three Types of Kinematic Feedback and the Execution of the Hang Power Clean
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Three Types of Kinematic Feedback and the Execution of the Hang Power Clean
Do you wish to request the book?
Three Types of Kinematic Feedback and the Execution of the Hang Power Clean
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Three Types of Kinematic Feedback and the Execution of the Hang Power Clean
2010
Overview
Rucci, JA and Tomporowski, PD. Three types of kinematic feedback and the execution of the hang power clean. J Strength Cond Res 24(3)771-778, 2010-The type and quality of feedback provided during instruction influences motor skill learning. The purpose of the study is to gain a better understanding of how altering feedback can impact discrete dynamic movements that are integral to strength training programs. The effects of 3 types of feedback on the execution hang power clean (4 sets of 4 repetitions at 75% of 1 repetition maximum) were evaluated over 6 training sessions. Nine different movement indices of the hang power clean were assessed using Dartfish video analysis software and comparisons among groups were made for each individually. Participantsʼ performance was predicted to benefit more from a combination of visual and verbal feedback cues than from visual feedback alone or verbal feedback alone. Results showed that 5 of the movement indices yielded a statistically significant interaction (p < 0.05). Analyses of movement form indicated that with training participants in both the video + cues group and the verbal-only group improved, whereas individuals in the video-only group did not. These results have implications for instructors seeking efficient methods of improving the way in which to teach female athletes to perform complex, dynamic, and technical movements through altering the type of feedback given.
Publisher
National Strength and Conditioning Association,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
