Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Caregivers of palliative care patients shoulder sustained demands eroding their quality of life
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Caregivers of palliative care patients shoulder sustained demands eroding their quality of life
Do you wish to request the book?
Caregivers of palliative care patients shoulder sustained demands eroding their quality of life
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Caregivers of palliative care patients shoulder sustained demands eroding their quality of life
2025
Overview
Abstract
Family caregivers sustain the palliative trajectory of people with advanced cancer, yet little is known about how service configuration shapes their quality of life (QoL). To compare the multidimensional QoL of caregivers assisting patients in outpatient versus home palliative-oncology programmes and to assess the influence of patient performance status. A cross-sectional survey enrolled 62 caregiver-patient dyads (37 outpatient; 25 home care) from a Northern Italian palliative network. Caregiver demographics, relationship, cohabitation and weekly care hours were collected, together with patient age, sex, diagnosis and functional status (Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]). QoL was measured using the Adult Carer QoL questionnaire (seven subscales plus total index). Group differences were examined with Mann-Whitney and t-tests. Home-care caregivers demonstrated higher total QoL (mean ± SD = 89.2 ± 10.8) than outpatient peers (79.5 ± 14.3; p < 0.01). Pronounced advantages for the home group were observed in “support for caring” (12.3 vs 8.5; p < 0.0001), “caring choice” (10.7 vs 8.9; p < 0.01) and “money matters” (10.7 vs 8.9; p < 0.001). No setting differences emerged for caring stress, personal growth, sense of value, ability to care or satisfaction. Caregiver QoL did not vary across patient KPS or ECOG categories (p > 0.34). Delivery setting, rather than patient functional decline, is the principal determinant of caregiver QoL. Outpatient caregivers report poorer support, restricted autonomy and heavier financial strain, signalling the need for respite, counselling and flexible scheduling within ambulatory oncology. Integrating caregiver-centred indicators into routine evaluation could strengthen family resilience and advance the European Public Health agenda for equitable, person-centred palliative care.
Key messages
• Caregiver QoL rises with home-based palliative care; outpatient carers suffer reduced support, autonomy and greater financial strain.
• Respite, financial counselling and flexible schedules in ambulatory oncology can close the QoL gap and fortify family resilience.
