Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Survey of DPT Students with Learning Disabilities in the State of Alabama
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Survey of DPT Students with Learning Disabilities in the State of Alabama
Do you wish to request the book?
A Survey of DPT Students with Learning Disabilities in the State of Alabama
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Survey of DPT Students with Learning Disabilities in the State of Alabama
2026
Overview
AIMS: Up to 15% of U.S. higher education students have a learning disability (LD) such as ADHD, dyslexia, or dysgraphia, which impacts academic skill acquisition. Limited research exists on students with LDs in healthcare science programs, and their representation in Doctor
of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs is unknown. This study aimed to explore the presence of students with LDs in Alabama DPT programs and to examine their perceptions of how their LDs impacted them and whether programs provided adequate accommodations. METHODS: A 12-item online
survey was distributed to 326 students across five Alabama DPT programs. RESULTS: Ninety-two students completed the survey; these students were mostly female (n=72) and in the age range of 23-24 years old (n=51). Data revealed that students with LDs were present
in these programs. Some reported that their LDs influenced their ability to gain admission and that accommodations during enrolment were insufficient. However, most students felt their LDs would not hinder their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that DPT programs
should acknowledge the growing presence of students with LDs, address potential barriers to admission, and ensure effective accommodations are provided. Encouraging students to utilize accommodations offices could enhance their academic experience. The confidence of students with LDs in their
clinical abilities should inspire both prospective students and DPT programs to support diversity in physical therapy education.
Publisher
The Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions,Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions
