Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Hydraulic investigation of flows at high-head overflow spillway with multiple aerators: a physical and numerical study of Mohmand Dam, Pakistan
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Hydraulic investigation of flows at high-head overflow spillway with multiple aerators: a physical and numerical study of Mohmand Dam, Pakistan
Do you wish to request the book?
Hydraulic investigation of flows at high-head overflow spillway with multiple aerators: a physical and numerical study of Mohmand Dam, Pakistan
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Hydraulic investigation of flows at high-head overflow spillway with multiple aerators: a physical and numerical study of Mohmand Dam, Pakistan
2024
Overview
A spillway is the essential part of the dam body, which releases surplus flows. At higher floods, the spillway operates at high heads, which results in high flow velocities along the chute and may cause negative pressures and cavitation. Therefore, to minimize such issues, aerators are provided along the spillway's chutes. This study aims to analyze the performance of the high-head overflow spillway of Mohmand Dam, Pakistan, having a steep chute of 32° with multiple aerators. Based on Froude's law of similitude, the physical model study was carried out at Irrigation Research Institute, Nandipur, on a scale of 1:60, while FLOW-3D numerical models were used to compare different hydraulic parameters, i.e., flow depth, velocity and pressure. The numerical models were validated with the results of a physical model, which were found in an acceptable range (i.e., 4.93%), and the hydraulic performance of two aerators was evaluated at different discharges. The models indicated negative pressures inside the aerator cavity, which allowed the suction of air to the lower nappe. The maximum air entrainment at the first aerator was about 8.5%. The results also showed that air entrainment to the lower nappe decreased when discharge was increased, whereas the maximum air detrainment reached 11.3% downstream of the second aerator.
