Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Feasibility of Very Early Identification of Cardiogenic Shock by Semi-automated Ultrasound Exam in the Emergency Department
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Feasibility of Very Early Identification of Cardiogenic Shock by Semi-automated Ultrasound Exam in the Emergency Department
Do you wish to request the book?
Feasibility of Very Early Identification of Cardiogenic Shock by Semi-automated Ultrasound Exam in the Emergency Department
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Feasibility of Very Early Identification of Cardiogenic Shock by Semi-automated Ultrasound Exam in the Emergency Department
2022
Overview
BackgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) is critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to reduced cardiac output. Early therapy, such as vasoactive agents or the initiation of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), requires early diagnosis and is associated with better outcomes. A novel ultrasound platform (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) has semi-automated imaging software (SAIS), which could simplify the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) diagnosis of CS. We assessed the feasibility of using POCUS with SAIS in patients in shock, determined the ability of SAIS to identify the subset of patients with CS, and described the process and outcome of care of patients with vs. without CS after presenting to Emergency Department (ED) with hypotension.MethodsThis prospective case-control study was conducted at an urban ED. Physicians with prior POCUS education received one hour of training with the study device. The qualitative ejection fraction was determined by visual assessment. SAIS measurements of hemodynamics were made with the study device and included left ventricle outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), inferior vena cava collapsibility or distensibility indices, and pulmonary B-line assessment. ED patients with a systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg or need for a vasopressor initiation in the ED were enrolled. The diagnosis of CS was determined by a medical record review. All data were summarized descriptively.ResultsTwenty-nine cases underwent POCUS, and 87 controls did not. Baseline characteristics, process, and outcome of care were similar between groups. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of cases had a complete POCUS with SAIS. Of these, 55% had reduced LVOT VTI, 38% had IVC collapsibility <50%, and 48% of cases had a B-line pattern consistent with pulmonary edema. The mean LVOT VTI for cases with CS was 9.4± 5.4 cm; the mean LVOT VTI for cases without CS was 15.2 ± 6.0 cm. Among patients who did not undergo POCUS, 31 (36%) had a formal echocardiogram, and eight (9%) had a final diagnosis of cardiogenic shock during hospitalization.ConclusionPhysicians with one hour of platform-specific training were able to implement POCUS with SAIS among patients who present with shock. POCUS with SAIS may aid in the early recognition of CS.
