Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
In search of a coherent theoretical foundation for LIS ethical principles: an appraisal of Floridi's Information Ethics
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
In search of a coherent theoretical foundation for LIS ethical principles: an appraisal of Floridi's Information Ethics
Do you wish to request the book?
In search of a coherent theoretical foundation for LIS ethical principles: an appraisal of Floridi's Information Ethics
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
In search of a coherent theoretical foundation for LIS ethical principles: an appraisal of Floridi's Information Ethics
2024
Overview
PurposeThis study aims to examine the potential of Information Ethics (IE) to serve as a coherent ethical foundation for the library and information science profession (LIS profession).Design/methodology/approachThis study consists of two parts: the first part present IE’s central theses and the main critiques it has received; the second part offers the authors' own evaluation of the theory from the LIS perspective in two steps: (1) assessing its internal consistency by testing its major theses against each other; (2) assessing its utility for resolving frequently debated LIS ethical dilemmas by comparing its solutions with solutions from other ethical theories.FindingsThis study finds that IE, consisting of an informational ontology, a fundamental ethical assertion and a series of moral laws, forms a coherent ethical framework and holds promising potential to serve as a theoretical foundation for LIS ethical issues; its inclusion of nonhuman objects as moral patients and its levels of abstraction mechanism proved to be particularly relevant for the LIS profession. This study also shows that, to become more solid an ethical theory, IE needs to resolve some of its internal contradictions and ambiguities, particularly its conceptual conflations between internal correctness, rightness and goodness; between destruction, entropy and evil; and the discrepancy between its deontological ethical assertion and its utilitarian moral laws.Practical implicationsThis study alerts LIS professionals to the possibility of having a coherent ethical foundation and the potential of IE in this regard.Originality/valueThis study provides a systemic explication, evaluation and field test of IE from the LIS perspective.
