Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
by
Ghazavi, M
, Geramian, Atefe
, Attari, N. K. A
in
Drainage
/ Earthquakes
/ Effectiveness
/ Galvanized steel
/ Geosynthetics
/ Geotechnical fabrics
/ Hydrostatic pressure
/ Internal dimensions
/ Liquefaction
/ Pore pressure
/ Pore water
/ Pore water pressure
/ Sand
/ Sand filters
/ Shake table tests
/ Stone
/ Stone columns
/ Urban development
/ Water pressure
/ Water purification
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
by
Ghazavi, M
, Geramian, Atefe
, Attari, N. K. A
in
Drainage
/ Earthquakes
/ Effectiveness
/ Galvanized steel
/ Geosynthetics
/ Geotechnical fabrics
/ Hydrostatic pressure
/ Internal dimensions
/ Liquefaction
/ Pore pressure
/ Pore water
/ Pore water pressure
/ Sand
/ Sand filters
/ Shake table tests
/ Stone
/ Stone columns
/ Urban development
/ Water pressure
/ Water purification
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
by
Ghazavi, M
, Geramian, Atefe
, Attari, N. K. A
in
Drainage
/ Earthquakes
/ Effectiveness
/ Galvanized steel
/ Geosynthetics
/ Geotechnical fabrics
/ Hydrostatic pressure
/ Internal dimensions
/ Liquefaction
/ Pore pressure
/ Pore water
/ Pore water pressure
/ Sand
/ Sand filters
/ Shake table tests
/ Stone
/ Stone columns
/ Urban development
/ Water pressure
/ Water purification
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
Journal Article
Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This paper presents the results of large shaking table tests to investigate the improvement effects of using ordinary stone columns (OSCs), geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs), and surrounded stone columns with filtering material (FSCs) on saturated sand. The internal dimensions of rigid box were 2.35 m and 0.9 m in plan and was filled with 1.1 m Firuzkuh sand using the water pluviation method. The diameters of stone columns (SCs) were 120 mm and 170 mm and the SCs spacing was 300 mm. The embedded lengths of SCs were 1100 mm. The results indicate that, although the increase in excess pore water pressure is not restrained by using OSCs, the use of both GESCs and FSCs are more effective to mitigate liquefaction potential. This is because of the effectiveness of the geotextile and sand filter on preventing the clogging of SCs and allowing permanent drainage of SCs during shaking. It was found that in the cases of unimproved sandy ground and improved sand by OSCs at 0.05 g loading horizontal acceleration, sand became totally liquefied, while in the cases of improved sand by GESCs or FSCs, under approximately 0.2 g acceleration, the soil close to the SCs was not liquefied.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.