MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest
Journal Article

Small canopy gaps do not affect the predation pressure on large ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a managed forest

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Continuous cover forestry is a silvicultural system designed to mimic natural forest dynamics and maintain the struc-ture of uneven-aged semi-natural forests. One of the key steps in this approach is to create small gaps in the canopy by logging small groups of trees or individual trees. In gap-cutting, the main goal is to determine the optimal shape and size of these gaps in order to ensure spontaneous natural regeneration of the major tree species in the canopy. Yet, it remains relatively unknown how various arthropods respond to such forestry practices. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) play an important role as predators of various small invertebrates and their predators are mostly vertebrates. The interactions between carabids and their predators might change due to shifts in the distribution of patches of suitable habitat as a result of forest management. Here, the aim was to determine whether gaps in the canopy of two different sizes (small vs. large) and shapes (circular vs. elongated) can affect the predation pressure on large carabids in a Hungarian oak-hornbeam forest. Using 3D-printed decoys of the largest com-mon carabid in the area, Carabus coriaceus, placed in each of the four gap treatments and control plots, the seasonal, diurnal, and treatment-specific aspects of predation pressure was estimated. This revealed no significant effects of any of the variables included in this study, which indicates that predation pressure in undisturbed controls located in closed forests and small canopy gaps did not differ significantly. Creating gaps in the canopy by felling few trees seems to be a good strategy for maintaining the forest ecological network with minimal disruption compared clear-felling large areas.