Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Post‐COVID Syndrome: A Randomized, Single‐Blind, Sham‐Controlled Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Post‐COVID Syndrome: A Randomized, Single‐Blind, Sham‐Controlled Study
Do you wish to request the book?
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Post‐COVID Syndrome: A Randomized, Single‐Blind, Sham‐Controlled Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Post‐COVID Syndrome: A Randomized, Single‐Blind, Sham‐Controlled Study
2025
Overview
Background Post‐COVID syndrome (PCS) is a condition that occurs after COVID‐19 infection that lasts for more than three months and adversely affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and sham taVNS in fatigue in individuals with PCS. Methods Forty‐two patients (20 male, 22 female) with PCS participated in this study. The severity of fatigue was assessed with the fatigue severity scale (FSS). Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in participants at baseline and after taVNS. The participants were randomly divided into two groups (taVNS and sham taVNS). taVNS was applied for 20 consecutive days for 30 min each (10 Hz, 300 μs). Results The groups were similar in FSS and HRV at baseline (p > 0.05). After the intervention, FSS decreased in taVNS (p = 0.018) and sham taVNS (p = 0.036). RMSSD increased in taVNS (p = 0.010), with no change in sham taVNS (p > 0.05) from baseline to after treatment. Stress index showed no change in both groups (p > 0.05). PNS index increased in taVNS (p = 0.007) and sham taVNS (p = 0.049). The SNS index and low frequency (LF) power decreased in taVNS (p = 0.001, p = 0.017, respectively), with no change in sham taVNS (p > 0.05). High frequency (HF) power showed no change within groups (p > 0.05). LF/HF decreased in taVNS (p = 0.002), with no change in sham taVNS (p > 0.05). Pre‐ and Post‐tests showed taVNS was more effective than sham taVNS in decreasing FSS (p = 0.022) and LF power (p = 0.029), in increasing PNS index (p = 0.016). There was a difference in HF power between groups after treatment (p = 0.042). Conclusion Both taVNS and sham taVNS were effective in reducing the severity of fatigue, with sham taVNS being superior to taVNS. The observed effect size was smaller than anticipated. This suggests that larger‐sample‐size studies are required to verify these results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05679505.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley
