MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration
Journal Article

Long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration

2020
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background No studies have assessed if 2‐week of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data provide good estimation of long‐term glycemic control and glucose variability (GV) in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as in adults. Methods Six hundred fifty‐four T1D pediatric patients were enrolled and 12‐weeks of CGM data, before HbA1c measurement, were collected. Metrics of glycemic control and GV in incremental sampling periods were calculated. The agreement between metrics calculated in the sampling periods and the full 12‐week period was assessed with correlation analysis (R2), median relative absolute difference (RAD) or absolute difference in the entire study populations and subjects stratified by age, pubertal status, insulin therapy (MDI,CSII), type of CGM (intermittently scanned [isCGM], real‐time [rtCGM]), and HbA1c level. Results Correlations with metrics of the full 12‐week period improved by extending the sampling periods. R2 values close to 0.90 using 4‐week period were significantly higher than 2‐week period, particularly for coefficient of variation, mean glucose SD, percentage of time below the range <70 mg/dL. A significant difference was found comparing the median RAD of 2‐ and 4‐week, especially for mean glucose and coefficient of variation. Similar results were obtained analyzing subjects according to age and pubertal status, whereas in patients with HbA1c ≤7%, using rtCGM and CSII significant correlations were found for 2‐week period. Conclusions In T1D pediatric subjects, 4‐week CGM data better reflects long‐term glycemic control and GV in MDI and isCGM users. The 2‐week period may be acceptably accurate in CSII and rtCGM users, especially in those with good glycometabolic control.