Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Optimization of LSTM Parameters for Flash Flood Forecasting Using Genetic Algorithm
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Optimization of LSTM Parameters for Flash Flood Forecasting Using Genetic Algorithm
Do you wish to request the book?
Optimization of LSTM Parameters for Flash Flood Forecasting Using Genetic Algorithm
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Optimization of LSTM Parameters for Flash Flood Forecasting Using Genetic Algorithm
2024
Overview
Accurate flood forecasts provide a critical time for authorities and the public to enact flood response measures and initiate evacuations. Long short-term memory (LSTM) is widely used in flood forecasting to ensure sufficient response time. The lag length of rainfall (LR), the number of hidden layers (NL), and the number of neurons (NN) are key parameters of the LSTM model. However, flood forecasting research seldom explores their optimization via the Genetic Algorithm (GA). This study introduces a novel LSTM-GA model, which integrates LSTM with GA to optimize the LR, NL, and NN for flash flood forecasting. The case study pertains to the water level forecasting of the Wu River in Taiwan. To assess the improvement brought by the proposed model, a standard LSTM model was utilized as a benchmark. This model accurately forecasted floods in the next 1 to 6 h, achieving a Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) score ranging from 0.896 to 0.906. It also exhibited strong flood peak forecast performance. The integration of GA enhanced the LSTM’s forecasting accuracy, with NSE scores rising to between 0.917 and 0.931. Notably, a shorter forecast lead time augmented the degree of improvement. In the LSTM model, LR was set as the river’s concentration time, and NL represented the water storage function of the watershed. For short lead time forecasting, surface runoff was the dominant factor, leading to smaller optimized values for LR and NL. Conversely, long lead time forecasting needed to consider the impact of subsurface and groundwater runoff, resulting in larger optimized values for LR and NL. In conclusion, the parameters optimized through GA consider the watershed’s characteristics.
