Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Calibrating non-probability surveys to estimated control totals using LASSO, with an application to political polling
by
Elliott, Michael R.
, Valliant, Richard L.
, Chen, Jack Kuang Tsung
in
Access
/ Adaptive control
/ Bias
/ Calibration
/ Election polls
/ Elections
/ General regression estimator
/ Health research
/ Medical research
/ Midterm elections
/ Model‐assisted calibration
/ Polls & surveys
/ Probability
/ Probability survey
/ Propensity weighting
/ Public opinion surveys
/ Research methodology
/ Response rates
/ Selection bias
/ Social research
/ Social sciences
/ Statistical analysis
/ Voting
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Calibrating non-probability surveys to estimated control totals using LASSO, with an application to political polling
by
Elliott, Michael R.
, Valliant, Richard L.
, Chen, Jack Kuang Tsung
in
Access
/ Adaptive control
/ Bias
/ Calibration
/ Election polls
/ Elections
/ General regression estimator
/ Health research
/ Medical research
/ Midterm elections
/ Model‐assisted calibration
/ Polls & surveys
/ Probability
/ Probability survey
/ Propensity weighting
/ Public opinion surveys
/ Research methodology
/ Response rates
/ Selection bias
/ Social research
/ Social sciences
/ Statistical analysis
/ Voting
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Calibrating non-probability surveys to estimated control totals using LASSO, with an application to political polling
by
Elliott, Michael R.
, Valliant, Richard L.
, Chen, Jack Kuang Tsung
in
Access
/ Adaptive control
/ Bias
/ Calibration
/ Election polls
/ Elections
/ General regression estimator
/ Health research
/ Medical research
/ Midterm elections
/ Model‐assisted calibration
/ Polls & surveys
/ Probability
/ Probability survey
/ Propensity weighting
/ Public opinion surveys
/ Research methodology
/ Response rates
/ Selection bias
/ Social research
/ Social sciences
/ Statistical analysis
/ Voting
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Calibrating non-probability surveys to estimated control totals using LASSO, with an application to political polling
Journal Article
Calibrating non-probability surveys to estimated control totals using LASSO, with an application to political polling
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Declining response rates and increasing costs have led to greater use of non-probability samples in election polling. But non-probability samples may suffer from selection bias due to differential access, degrees of interest and other factors. Here we estimate voting preference for 19 elections in the US 2014 midterm elections by using large non-probability surveys obtained from SurveyMonkey users, calibrated to estimated control totals using model-assisted calibration combined with adaptive LASSO regression, or the estimated controlled LASSO, ECLASSO. Comparing the bias and root-mean-square error of ECLASSO with traditional calibration methods shows that ECLASSO can be a powerful method for adjusting non-probability surveys even when only a small sample is available from a probability survey. The methodology proposed has potentially broad application across social science and health research, as response rates for probability samples decline and access to non-probability samples increases.
Publisher
Wiley,Oxford University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.