Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice (Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri) caused by dietary adaptations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice (Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri) caused by dietary adaptations
Do you wish to request the book?
Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice (Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri) caused by dietary adaptations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice (Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri) caused by dietary adaptations
2026
Overview
The inhibitory cascade model (ICM) predicts relative mammalian molar size and shows a relationship between relative molar size and diet. Bears do not follow the ICM. The aims of this study are to determine which bears, if any, adhere to the ICM, and to assess the evolution of dental development in bears to determine when and why their developmental pattern changed. Molars were measured with sliding callipers and occlusal surface area was taken as a proxy for molar size. An ICM morphospace was created with relative m2 and m3 size on the x‐ and y‐axes, respectively. Our findings indicate that there are two deviations from the ICM. The first takes place between Ursus boeckhi and Ursus minimus and is attributed to a reduction in inhibitors in m1. We suggest the term ‘partial ICM’ to describe the developmental pattern of bears following the first deviation, as their distribution in morphospace runs parallel to the ICM yet is shifted towards a disproportionately larger m2 associated with increased omnivory. The second break takes place between Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri and is caused by a reduction in inhibitors in m2 resulting in a shift towards disproportionately larger m3 associated with increased herbivory. The two breaks in the established developmental pattern of the ICM are linked to dietary adaptations that can be traced to environmental change, showing the effects of the environment on development on evolutionary time scales. Bears deviate from the inhibitory cascade model (ICM) during molar size evolution, with two significant deviations linked to changes in diet: Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri. Many bears exhibit a ‘partial ICM’, highlighting the relationship between relative molar size, dietary adaptations and dental development across different species. (Bear outlines adapted from DBCLS, CCBY4.0)
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley Online Library
Subject
