Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of three approaches for adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of three approaches for adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of three approaches for adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparison of three approaches for adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism
2025
Overview
Purpose
To compare the feasibility and safety of three approaches for bilateral adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and their influence on the outcomes of adrenalectomy for dominant lateral primary aldosteronism (PA).
Methods
182 PA patients who underwent AVS at Fuwai Hospital between January 2022 and March 2024 were enrolled. According to the puncture access, patients were divided into three groups: simultaneous AVS via antecubital approach group (Group A,
N
= 48), simultaneous AVS via femoral approach group (Group B,
N
= 44) and sequential AVS via antecubital approach group (Group C,
N
= 90). The baseline data, procedure parameters, success rates, complication rates and follow-up data were analyzed.
Results
The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly among three groups (all
P
> 0.05). The procedure time (18.9 ± 7.4 min vs. 25.2 ± 7.5 min;
P
< 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (7.1 ± 3.8 min vs. 10.8 ± 6.2 min;
P
< 0.001) were shorter in Group A than in Group C. However, there was no significant difference between Group A and B (all
P
> 0.05). The bilateral sampling success rates in Groups A, B and C were 93.8%, 93.2% and 91.1%, respectively, which were not significantly different (
P
= 0.936). One (0.5%) adrenal haematoma was recorded in Group B. The complete clinical success rate (
P
= 0.894) and complete biochemical success rate (
P
= 0.954) were not significantly different in patients with dominant lateralization who underwent adrenalectomy.
Conclusion
This study revealed that three approaches for AVS are safe and feasible, with similar outcomes after adrenalectomy. Simultaneous AVS via antecubital approach might be a better choice considering its shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time and comfort.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
