MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Journal Article

Relationship Between QRS Fragmentation on Electrocardiogram and Myocardial Scar Characterization on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Fragmented QRS (fQRS) on electrocardiogram (ECG) may reflect myocardial fibrosis in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Gray zone on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which represents a heterogeneous interface between dense scar and viable myocardium, is a known predictor of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks or death. The relationship between fQRS and myocardial scar on CMR remains poorly studied and may improve risk stratification for ICD therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between fQRS and scar core/gray zone by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and to determine whether fQRS predicts benefit from ICD therapy. We included 388 adults who underwent CMR followed by ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention between 2005 and 2018 at 2 tertiary centers. ECGs were assessed for fQRS and CMR images were independently evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or appropriate ICD shock. Mean age was 61 ± 13 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 32%. LGE was present in 69% and fQRS in 28%. fQRS was associated with greater scar burden on visual LGE assessment (p = 0.036), but not with quantitative LGE measures (2SD, 4SD, FWHM) or gray zone. Over a median follow-up of 61 months, 36% experienced the primary outcome. In multivariable analysis adjusting for LVEF and other prognosticators, fQRS was not independently associated with the primary outcome (HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.67–1.08; p = 0.20). In conclusion, fQRS is associated with scar burden by visual assessment but does not provide incremental predictive value for ICD benefit.