Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Faster Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) After Trisectionectomy Does Not Translate to Better Outcomes
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Faster Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) After Trisectionectomy Does Not Translate to Better Outcomes
Do you wish to request the book?
Faster Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) After Trisectionectomy Does Not Translate to Better Outcomes
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Faster Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) After Trisectionectomy Does Not Translate to Better Outcomes
2021
Overview
Background
Resection with trisectionectomy may necessitate liver molding for adequate future liver remnant (FLR), and subsequent complications can impact return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT). This study evaluated whether a difference in RIOT exists with the use of molding and between liver molding techniques (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy [ALPPS] and portal vein embolization [PVE]) with trisectionectomy.
Methods
A retrospective review evaluated trisectionectomies for malignancy. Outcomes were compared with and without molding, and RIOT was determined.
Results
Fifty-one patients underwent trisectionectomy: 11 ALPPS, 14 PVE, 26 without molding. 73% of ALPPS, 64% of PVE, and 58% without molding achieved RIOT (P = .971). There were no differences found in baseline characteristics, R0 rate, length of stay, readmission, complications, or mortality. Time to RIOT was significantly different (ALPPS: 3.3 months; PVE: 5.2 months; none: 2.4 months, P = .0203). There were no differences in recurrence or survival.
Conclusions
Liver molding should not cause apprehension as there are no differences in achieving RIOT. Although technique alters time to RIOT, this does not translate into improved outcomes, implicating disease biology, and regeneration stimulus.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.