Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence
by
CORREIA, FABRICE
in
Consequentialism
/ Logical conjunctions
/ Logical disjunction
/ Logical givens
/ Logical theorems
/ Metaphysics
/ Ontological essence
/ Philosophical object
/ Political philosophy
/ Politicians
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence
by
CORREIA, FABRICE
in
Consequentialism
/ Logical conjunctions
/ Logical disjunction
/ Logical givens
/ Logical theorems
/ Metaphysics
/ Ontological essence
/ Philosophical object
/ Political philosophy
/ Politicians
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In his influential paper \"Essence and Modality\", Kit Fine argues that no account of essence framed in terms of metaphysical necessity is possible, and that it is rather metaphysical necessity which is to be understood in terms of essence. On his account, the concept of essence is primitive, and for a proposition to be metaphysically necessary is for it to be true in virtue of the nature of all things. Fine also proposes a reduction of conceptual and logical necessity in the same vein: a conceptual necessity is a proposition true in virtue of the nature of all concepts, and a logical necessity a proposition true in virtue of the nature of all logical concepts. I argue that the plausibility of Fine's view crucially requires that certain apparent explanatory links between essentialist facts be admitted and accounted for, and I make a suggestion about how this can be done. I then argue against the reductions of conceptual and logical necessity proposed by Fine and suggest alternative reductions, which remain nevertheless Finean in spirit.
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd,Wiley
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.