MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model
Journal Article

Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a classification system that seeks to organize psychopathology using quantitative evidence - yet the current model was established by narrative review. This meta-analysis provides a quantitative synthesis of literature on transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology to evaluate the validity of the HiTOP framework. Published studies estimating factor-analytic models from ( diagnoses were screened. A total of 120,596 participants from 35 studies assessing 23 diagnoses were included in the meta-analytic models. Data were pooled into a meta-analytic correlation matrix using a random effects model. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using the pooled correlation matrix. A hierarchical structure was estimated by extracting one to five factors representing levels of the HiTOP framework, then calculating congruence coefficients between factors at sequential levels. Five transdiagnostic dimensions fit the diagnoses well (comparative fit index = 0.92, root mean square error of approximation = 0.07, and standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.03). Most diagnoses had factor loadings >|0.30| on the expected factors, and congruence coefficients between factors indicated a hierarchical structure consistent with the HiTOP framework. A model closely resembling the HiTOP framework fit the data well and placement of diagnoses within transdiagnostic dimensions were largely confirmed, supporting it as valid structure for conceptualizing and organizing psychopathology. Results also suggest transdiagnostic research should (1) use traits, narrow symptoms, and dimensional measures of psychopathology instead of diagnoses, (2) assess a broader array of constructs, and (3) increase focus on understudied pathologies.