Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study
Do you wish to request the book?
Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study
2021
Overview
ObjectiveUrethrocutaneous fistula is the most prevalent complication after hypospadias repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether incised urethral diversion was superior to traditional transurethral diversion in minimizing complications.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively collected and analyzed 113 cases with proximal penile or penoscrotal hypospadias that were repaired by one-stage transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty between January 2016 and January 2020. Of those cases, 60 used incised urethral diversion (group A), whereas the remaining 53 were managed by transurethral diversion (group B) for urinary drainage after surgery. Postoperative complications in both groups were assessed for fistula, urethral diverticulum, meatal stenosis, wound infection, and distal urethral breakdown.ResultsFistula was reported in 2 patients (3.3%) in group A, while it was observed in 15 patients (28.3%) in group B (p < 0.001). Wound infection occurred in one patient (1.7%) in group A, compared with six patients (11.3%) in group B (p < 0.05). The incidence rates of distal urethral breakdown were 1.7% (1/60) and 11.3% (6/53) for group A and group B, respectively (p < 0.05). One patient (1.7%) in group A and three patients (5.7%) in group B had a meatal stenosis (p > 0.05). There were two patients who developed urethral diverticulum in either group (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe use of incised urethral diversion for urinary drainage had an advantage over transurethral diversion in one-stage hypospadias repair with respect to the post-operational fistula occurrence, wound infection, and distal urethral breakdown.
