Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Sex differences in cardiovascular adaptations in recreational marathon runners
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Sex differences in cardiovascular adaptations in recreational marathon runners
Do you wish to request the book?
Sex differences in cardiovascular adaptations in recreational marathon runners
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Sex differences in cardiovascular adaptations in recreational marathon runners
2021
Overview
IntroductionThere are well-established sex differences in central hemodynamic and cardiac adaptations to endurance exercise; however, controversial evidence suggests that excessive endurance exercise may be related to detrimental cardiovascular adaptations in marathoners.PurposeTo examine left ventricle (LV) structure, LV function, 24-h central hemodynamics and ventricular–vascular coupling in male and female marathoners and recreationally active adults.Methods52 marathoners (41 ± 5 years, n = 28 female, completed 6 ± 1 marathons/3 years) and 49 recreationally active controls (42 ± 5 years, n = 25 female) participated in the study. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography (3DE) was used to measure LV mass index and LV longitudinal (LS) circumferential (CS), area (AS), and radial strain (RS). An ambulatory blood pressure (BP) cuff was used to measure 24-h central hemodynamics (BP, pulse wave velocity, PWV, wave reflection index, RIx). Hemodynamic and 3DE measures were combined to derive the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to ventricular elastance (Elv) as a global measure of ventricular–vascular coupling.ResultsThere were no sex or group differences in LS, CS, AS, and RS (p > 0.05). Females marathoners had similar aortic BP (116 ± 9 vs. 113 ± 1 mmHg), and PWV (5.9 ± 0.5 vs. 5.9 ± 1.1 m/s) compared to female controls but lower aSBP (116 ± 9 vs. 131 ± 10 mmHg) and PWV (5.9 ± 0.5 vs. 6.2 ± 0.5 m/s) compared to male marathoners (p < 0.05). Female marathoners had lower Ea/Elv than female controls (0.67 ± 0.20 vs. 0.93 ± 0.36) and male marathoners (0.67 ± 0.20 vs. 0.85 ± 0.42, p < 0.05).ConclusionsWomen that have completed multiple marathons do not have reduced LV function or increased aortic stiffness and may have better ventricular–vascular coupling compared to male marathoners and their female untrained counterparts.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
