MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study
Journal Article

Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
PurposeThe diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) remains challenging, particularly in patients presenting with lobar or patchy consolidation on chest radiographs. Biopsies are sometimes performed for histopathologic examination and microbiological culture to differentiate infections, including PC, from lung cancers. However, to date, the clinical value of small biopsy samples and their reasonable processing methods for detecting Cryptococcus are rarely evaluated. Furthermore, the cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) test has been widely used in cryptococcosis diagnosis due to its high specificity. This 6-year retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of four tests commonly used for detecting Cryptococcus in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis, and reveal that the combination of 2 or 3 methods would raise diagnosis sensitivity.MethodsThe results of CrAg test, histopathologic examination and routine cryptococcal culture of sputum/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were collected from hospitalized patients between June 2019 to May 2024. Additionally, the results of 4 above-mentioned methods were analyzed to compare their effectiveness in PC diagnosis.ResultsAmong 1508 patients whose biopsy specimens were sent for pathogen detection, 63 PC cases were diagnosed, and 24 C. neoformans strains were cultivated using the Myco/F Lytic culture, which was more than those by sputum/BALF culture (9 strains). CrAg was positive in 82.5% (52/63) PC patients and remained the most sensitive method. The combination of CrAg and biopsy culture will increase the overall diagnostic yield to 95.2% (60/63).ConclusionsIn summary, for those having biopsy tissue collected, the combination of CrAg and biopsy culture using Myco/F could effectively identify most PC cases.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks