Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Accuracy of Empirical Satellite Algorithms for Mapping Phytoplankton Diagnostic Pigments in the Open Ocean: A Supervised Learning Perspective
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Accuracy of Empirical Satellite Algorithms for Mapping Phytoplankton Diagnostic Pigments in the Open Ocean: A Supervised Learning Perspective
Do you wish to request the book?
Accuracy of Empirical Satellite Algorithms for Mapping Phytoplankton Diagnostic Pigments in the Open Ocean: A Supervised Learning Perspective
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Accuracy of Empirical Satellite Algorithms for Mapping Phytoplankton Diagnostic Pigments in the Open Ocean: A Supervised Learning Perspective
2020
Overview
Monitoring phytoplankton community composition from space is an important challenge in ocean remote sensing. Researchers have proposed several algorithms for this purpose. However, the in-situ data used to train and validate such algorithms at the global scale are often clustered along ship cruise tracks and in some well-studied locations, whereas many large marine regions have no in-situ data at all. Furthermore, oceanographic variables are typically spatially auto-correlated. In this situation, the common practice of validating algorithms with randomly chosen held-out observations can underestimate errors. Based on a global database of in-situ HPLC data, we applied supervised learning methods to train and test empirical algorithms predicting the relative concentrations of eight diagnostic pigments that serve as biomarkers for different phytoplankton types. For each pigment, we trained three types of satellite algorithms distinguished by their input data: abundance-based (using only chlorophyll-a as input), spectral (using remote sensing reflectance), and ecological algorithms (combining reflectance and environmental variables). The algorithms were implemented as statistical models (smoothing splines, polynomials, random forests and boosted regression trees). To address clustering of data and spatial auto-correlation, we tested the algorithms by means of spatial block cross-validation. This provided a less confident picture of the potential for global mapping of diagnostic pigments and hence the associated phytoplankton types using existing satellite data than suggested by some previous research and a 5-fold cross-validation conducted for comparison. Of the eight diagnostic pigments, only two (fucoxanthin and zeaxanthin) could be predicted in marine regions that the algorithms were not trained in with considerably lower errors than a constant null model. Thus, global-scale algorithms based on existing, multi-spectral satellite data and commonly available environmental variables can estimate relative diagnostic pigment concentrations and hence distinguish phytoplankton types in some broad classes, but are likely inaccurate for some classes and in some marine regions. Overall, the ecological algorithms had the lowest prediction errors. Finally, our results suggest that more discussion of the best approaches for training and validating empirical satellite algorithms is needed if the in-situ data are unevenly distributed in the study region and spatially clustered.
