MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Journal Article

Popularity versus similarity in growing networks

2012
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A framework is developed in which new connections to a growing network optimize geometric trade-offs between popularity and similarity, instead of simply preferring popular nodes; this approach accurately describes the large-scale evolution of various networks. Networks driven by the liked and alike Preferential attachment is a mechanism that attempts to explain the emergence of scaling in growing networks. If new connections are preferentially established with more popular nodes in a network, then the network is scale-free. So, because 'popularity is attractive', does preferential attachment predict network evolution? This study shows that popularity is a strong force in shaping complex network structure and dynamics, but so too is similarity. The authors develop a model that increases the accuracy of network-evolution predictions by considering the trade-offs between popularity and similarity. The model accurately describes large-scale evolution of technological (Internet), social and metabolic networks, predicting the probability of new links with high precision. The principle 1 that ‘popularity is attractive’ underlies preferential attachment 2 , which is a common explanation for the emergence of scaling in growing networks. If new connections are made preferentially to more popular nodes, then the resulting distribution of the number of connections possessed by nodes follows power laws 3 , 4 , as observed in many real networks 5 , 6 . Preferential attachment has been directly validated for some real networks (including the Internet 7 , 8 ), and can be a consequence of different underlying processes based on node fitness, ranking, optimization, random walks or duplication 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 . Here we show that popularity is just one dimension of attractiveness; another dimension is similarity 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 . We develop a framework in which new connections optimize certain trade-offs between popularity and similarity, instead of simply preferring popular nodes. The framework has a geometric interpretation in which popularity preference emerges from local optimization. As opposed to preferential attachment, our optimization framework accurately describes the large-scale evolution of technological (the Internet), social (trust relationships between people) and biological ( Escherichia coli metabolic) networks, predicting the probability of new links with high precision. The framework that we have developed can thus be used for predicting new links in evolving networks, and provides a different perspective on preferential attachment as an emergent phenomenon.