Journal Article

Liars know they are lying: differentiating disinformation from disagreement

Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Oreskes, Naomi, van der Linden, Sander, Cook, John, Roozenbeek, Jon, McIntyre, Lee C.

2024

Overview

Mis- and disinformation pose substantial societal challenges, and have thus become the focus of a substantive field of research. However, the field of misinformation research has recently come under scrutiny on two fronts. First, a political response has emerged, claiming that misinformation research aims to censor conservative voices. Second, some scholars have questioned the utility of misinformation research altogether, arguing that misinformation is not sufficiently identifiable or widespread to warrant much concern or action. Here, we rebut these claims. We contend that the spread of misinformation—and in particular willful disinformation—is demonstrably harmful to public health, evidence-informed policymaking, and democratic processes. We also show that disinformation and outright lies can often be identified and differ from good-faith political contestation. We conclude by showing how misinformation and disinformation can be at least partially mitigated using a variety of empirically validated, rights-preserving methods that do not involve censorship.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V,Springer Nature
• Subject: Censorship / Conservatism / Democracy / Developing countries / False information / Information sharing / LDCs / Misinformation / Policy making / Political campaigns / Politicians / Politics / Power / Presidential elections / Propaganda / Public health / Public opinion / Scrutiny / Trump, Donald J / Voters