Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals
by
Karg, Simon T.
, Chrysochou, Polymeros
, Mitkidis, Panagiotis
, Morris, Brandi S.
in
Arousal
/ Brain
/ Climate change
/ Efficacy
/ Emotions
/ Experiments
/ Extinction
/ Helplessness
/ Mass extinctions
/ Optimism
/ Perception
/ Perceptions
/ Pessimism
/ Reactivity
/ Risk
/ Risk perception
/ Urgency
/ Worldview
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals
by
Karg, Simon T.
, Chrysochou, Polymeros
, Mitkidis, Panagiotis
, Morris, Brandi S.
in
Arousal
/ Brain
/ Climate change
/ Efficacy
/ Emotions
/ Experiments
/ Extinction
/ Helplessness
/ Mass extinctions
/ Optimism
/ Perception
/ Perceptions
/ Pessimism
/ Reactivity
/ Risk
/ Risk perception
/ Urgency
/ Worldview
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals
by
Karg, Simon T.
, Chrysochou, Polymeros
, Mitkidis, Panagiotis
, Morris, Brandi S.
in
Arousal
/ Brain
/ Climate change
/ Efficacy
/ Emotions
/ Experiments
/ Extinction
/ Helplessness
/ Mass extinctions
/ Optimism
/ Perception
/ Perceptions
/ Pessimism
/ Reactivity
/ Risk
/ Risk perception
/ Urgency
/ Worldview
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals
Journal Article
Optimistic vs. pessimistic endings in climate change appeals
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The use of emotion in climate change appeals is a hotly debated topic. Warning about the perils of imminent mass extinction, climate change communicators are often accused of being unnecessarily ‘doomsday’ in their attempts to foster a sense of urgency and action among the public. Pessimistic messaging, the thinking goes, undermines engagement efforts, straining credulity and fostering a sense of helplessness, rather than concern. Widespread calls for more optimistic climate change messaging punctuate public discourse. This research puts these claims to the test, investigating how affective endings (optimistic vs. pessimistic vs. fatalistic) of climate change appeals impact individual risk perception and outcome efficacy (i.e., the sense that one’s behavior matters). The findings of three online experiments presented in this paper suggest that climate change appeals with pessimistic affective endings increase risk perception (Studies 1 and 2) and outcome efficacy (Study 3), which is the result of heightened emotional arousal (Studies 1–3). Moreover, the results indicate that the mediating effect of emotional arousal is more prevalent among political moderates and conservatives, as well as those who hold either individualistic or hierarchical world views. Given that these audiences generally exhibit lower risk perception and outcome efficacy in relation to climate change, the results suggest that climate change appeals with pessimistic endings could trigger higher engagement with the issue than optimistic endings. These findings are interpreted in light of recent research findings, which suggest that differences in threat-reactivity and emotional arousal may be attributable to brain functions/anatomy mappable to basic motivations for safety and survival. Implications for scholars and practitioners are discussed.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.