Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Shifting range in a stingless bee leads to pre-mating reproductive interference between species
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Shifting range in a stingless bee leads to pre-mating reproductive interference between species
Do you wish to request the book?
Shifting range in a stingless bee leads to pre-mating reproductive interference between species
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Shifting range in a stingless bee leads to pre-mating reproductive interference between species
2023
Overview
Human-induced shifts in species’ ranges can increase contact between closely related species and lead to reproductive interference. In Australia, climate change and trade in stingless bee colonies is increasing the range overlap of two cryptic species: Tetragonula carbonaria and T. hockingsi. To investigate reproductive interactions between these species, we validated a diagnostic-PCR test based on the mitochondrial gene COI to ID field specimens to species. We then assessed the likelihood of reproductive interference in four ways. First, we imaged the male genitalia of each species and found no evidence of reproductive character displacement. Second, we assessed species composition of mating aggregations in an area of sympatry (Southeast Queensland) and confirmed that some males join the mating aggregations of interspecific colonies. Third, we translocated T. hockingsi colonies into the southern range of T. carbonaria (Sydney) and tracked their ability to requeen. These translocated colonies attracted mating aggregations comprised almost entirely of interspecific males, but never formed hybrid colonies; instead, queens either mated with their brothers, or the colony failed to requeen at all. Finally, we presented T. carbonaria males with either conspecific or interspecific virgin queens and found that males attempted to mate only with their own species’ queens. In all, we conclude that reproductive barriers between these species are complete with respect to “short-range” mating cues, but not for “long-range” mate attraction cues. Our study highlights that hive movements can increase some forms of pre-mating reproductive interference between managed bee species, even where the species do not actually mate or hybridize.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
