Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Enhancing ESG Risk Assessment with Litigation Signals: A Legal-AI Hybrid Approach for Detecting Latent Risks
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Enhancing ESG Risk Assessment with Litigation Signals: A Legal-AI Hybrid Approach for Detecting Latent Risks
Do you wish to request the book?
Enhancing ESG Risk Assessment with Litigation Signals: A Legal-AI Hybrid Approach for Detecting Latent Risks
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Enhancing ESG Risk Assessment with Litigation Signals: A Legal-AI Hybrid Approach for Detecting Latent Risks
2025
Overview
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings are widely used for investment and regulatory decision-making, yet they often suffer from symbolic compliance and information asymmetry. To address these limitations, this study introduces a hybrid ESG risk assessment model that integrates court ruling data with traditional ESG ratings to detect latent sustainability risks. Using a dataset of 213 ESG-related U.S. court rulings from January 2023 to May 2025, we apply natural language processing (TF-IDF, Legal-BERT) and explainable AI (SHAP) techniques to extract structured features from legal texts. We construct and compare classification models—including Random Forest, XGBoost, and a Legal-BERT-based hybrid model—to predict firms’ litigation risk. The hybrid model significantly outperforms the baseline ESG-only model in all key metrics: F1-score (0.81), precision (0.79), recall (0.84), and AUC-ROC (0.87). SHAP analysis reveals that legal features such as regulatory sanctions and governance violations are the most influential predictors. This study demonstrates the empirical value of integrating adjudicated legal evidence into ESG modeling and offers a transparent, verifiable framework to enhance ESG risk evaluation and reduce information asymmetry in sustainability assessments.
Publisher
MDPI AG
